SIGN UP NOW
Follow the NWC on Twitter!Follow the NWC on Facebook!

Whistleblower News This Week -- 4/29/08

Some interesting whistleblower stories have been cropping up around the country over the past week or so:

1. Four years after blowing the whistle, FAA air-traffic controller Anne Whiteman's allegations are finally being addressed, and hopefully she is feeling some measure of vindication. Ms. Whiteman disclosed that the FAA had systematically covered up errors by other air-traffic controllers by classifying the incidents as "pilot error."  This meant that potentially life-threatening incidents were not being acted upon, but rather, they were swept under the rug. The FAA, now finding itself under the microscope after two whistleblowers testified before a House committee earlier this month, has been forced to take action on this issue.


2. In another story of whistleblowing in the aviation industry, the Department of Labor has announced that the Scottsdale, AZ, based West Jet Aircraft must pay nearly $100,000 in back pay and compensatory damages to a whistleblower who was fired after he/she (the whistleblower was not identified)  reported the company for, among other things "performing a test flight with passengers on board."


3.) The first-ever whistleblower case under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is still being adjudicated. The Associated Press article, aptly titled "The Whistleblower's Undending Story," tells an all-too familiar tale...
Tags:

After Murphy v. IRS...Pursuing Tax Justice for Whistleblowers in Congress

Although the Supreme Court refused to hear the case of Murphy v. IRS, the fight is not over! The National Whistleblower Center has issued this Action Alert, urging all supporters to email their Senators and Representatives and tell them to support the Civil Rights Tax Relief Act of 2007.

Click here for more info>>

Supreme Court Denies Cert in Murphy v. IRS

In an order posted today on the its website, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it will not be hearing the Murphy v. IRS appeal. Although this is a disappointing turn of events, whistleblower and civil rights advocates should continue the fight for tax justice, both in other judicial venues, and in the halls of Congress.  

In response to the news, the National Whistleblower Center put out the following press release:

Continue Reading...

Murphy v. IRS Decision on Certiorari May Come Today

The Supreme Court Justices were scheduled to have a conference this morning to rule on petitions for certiorari, including in the case of Murphy v. IRS.

We will keep you updated on any developments.

UPDATE: We just received word that the results of the conference will not be revealed until Monday morning. We will let you know as soon as we find out. Check back after the weekend!

Whistleblower News This Week -- 4/15/08

Three news stories about whistleblowers have caught my attention this week, and I wanted to share them with everyone.


1.)    Briefs have been filed in a potentially precedent-setting case for one Maryland state whistleblower law. The case, Lark v. Montgomery Hospice, Inc. -- pending before the Court of Appeals of Maryland -- could determine whether Maryland's Healthcare Worker Whistleblower Protection Act should protect whistleblowers who report their claims internally (within their chain of command), or if the law only applies to those employees who report their claims to a regulatory agency. Since we know (both by empirical evidence and just plain common sense) that the vast majority of employees reporting wrongdoing go to their supervisor first, then it only makes sense that strong whistleblower laws should always protect employees who report internally.

The American Nurses Association, a professional organization representing nearly 3 million registered nurses, has filed an amicus brief on behalf of the whistleblower in this case. See the ANA press release here>>




Continue Reading...
Tags:

Supreme Court to Rule on Murphy v. IRS Cert Petition

The Supreme Court has distributed the Murphy v. IRS case for the Conference to be held on April 18, 2008. The Justices of the Supreme Court will decide on that date whether or not to grant the petition for certiorari filed on behalf of Ms. Murphy. It takes 4 votes to grant a petition.


Keep checking back (or sign up for our RSS feeds) for updates on this issue.


Retaliation Against FAA Whistleblowers Highlight the Need For Legislative Action

As you have no doubt heard, last week two Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) employees told reporters that Southwest Airlines had engaged in an extended campaign to avoid mandatory safety inspections and had attempted to have FAA inspectors who discovered the violations removed. This is just another shocking story that illustrates the need for federal employee whistleblower protections.


Continue Reading...

South Carolina State Troopers Need Whistleblower Protection

A troubling whistleblower story has been developing in South Carolina. The federal authorities and  the South Carolina state senate is investigating systematic retaliation by the SC State Police against their own officers who report illegal activity within the agency. Read about it here>>


Most recently, whistleblowers' disclosures there have led to the release of these shocking videos, showing officers using their vehicles as a weapon to ram fleeing suspects.


As one state senator put it, the SC State police has been run by "good ol' boy politics."


Hopefully the state and federal investigations in South Carolina will root out the wrongdoers and result in the proper reforms, but this instance really shows the need for better state and federal laws to protect whistleblowers. After the devastating 2006 Garcetti v. Ceballos Supreme Court decision, government whistleblowers no longer have the First Amendment to rely on as a shield against retaliation, which leaves them with basically no protection whatsoever.

False Claims Act Correction Act (S.2041) Approved by Committee, Heading to the Senate Floor

As was widely expected, the FCA Corrections Act was quickly approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday, and will now face a fight on the Senate floor. Committee member Charles Grassley, who has been considered to be the father of the modern False Claims Act since resuscitating the law in 1986 , has shepherded the bill this far, with bi-partisan support. We can be sure, though, that the powerful healthcare and defense contracting lobbies will be fighting these reforms tooth and nail, in both the House and the Senate. (The House bill is HR.4854). 




Sign up for our RSS feeds

Committee Vote on S.2041, False Claims Act Correction Act, Rescheduled for This Week

According to the website of the Senate Judiciary Committee, that body will be voting to send the FCA Corrections Act (S.2041) to the Senate floor this Thursday, April 3rd, 2008 @ 10AM.