New TSA Whistleblower Rights are Illusory

Congress must enact real whistleblower protections


The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) announced today that it has entered into agreements with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) and Office of Special Counsel (OSC) to permit TSA employees to appeal whistleblower complaints to the MSPB.


These so-called “enhanced” whistleblower protections for TSA employees are completely illusory and ineffective.  These new TSA procedures provide no more than the inadequate and completely dysfunctional whistleblower appeal rights currently afforded to other federal government workers. 


The OSC’s track record of protecting whistleblowers over the last several years is abysmal.  OSC rules for whistleblowers less than 3% of the time and the head of OSC is under criminal investigation for obstruction of justice. MSPB rarely grants whistleblowers a fair hearing.  Over the last several years MSPB has ruled in favor of whistleblowers less than 5% of the time, and that number is rapidly declining.


In March of 2007, the House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed H.R. 985, “The Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2007,” by a bi-partisan vote of 331 to 94.  However, H.R. 985 has not been enacted into law and the most important “enhanced” whistleblower protections contained in that bill, such as the right to recover compensatory damages, de novo review and jury trials in federal court, have been stalled in the Senate.


Yesterday, both the House and Senate agreed to strong whistleblower protections in the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act.  Notably, the Consumer Product Safety whistleblower protections extends to manufacturing employees some of the strongest whistleblower protections in the country, including access to jury trials in federal courts with strong remedies, including reinstatement, backpay, compensatory damages, and attorneys fees.


It is about time for Congress to enact the same strong whistleblower protections for all federal employees (including TSA screeners) that should soon be provided to manufacturing employees under the Consumer Safety Product whistleblower law.

OSC Controversy Continues after Top Bloch Aide Resigns

Back in May I blogged about the disgrace that has become the Office of Special Counsel. At that time the head of the OSC, Scott Bloch, had his home and office raided by FBI agents in an obstruction of justice probe.


Now, more trouble is brewing at OSC. On Saturday, Bloch's Deputy Special Counsel Jim Byrne resigned, and in his resignation letter skewered Bloch, saying:


"Upon my departure, I am obligated to note that the mission, independence, and very existence of the Office of Special Counsel are--and shall remain--at risk unless and until this agency is afforded a presidentially appointed, senate confirmed leader who is capable of putting OSC's mission and OSC's people ahead of political agendas and personal vendettas."

The Washington Times and POGO's blog carried reports on this issue last week.


NPR also has a related story, reporting that President Bush has so far refused fire Bloch, although he has been counseled to do so by senior advisers.