Another Example of Why Court Access for All Federal Employees is Essential for Meaningful Whistleblower Protection

Bookmark and Share


On Monday, the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) issued a decision once again denying whistleblower protection to a courageous federal employee.  In July 2003, U.S. Federal Air Marshal Robert MacLean blew the whistle on the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) plans to remove air marshals from long distance flights during the height of a terrorist alert in order to save money.  Congressional outrage the day after MacLean’s disclosure prevented the TSA from implementing the plan and the security of long distance flights was never compromised. On August 31, 2006, over four months after terminating MacLean and over three years after MacLean’s disclosure the TSA issued a regulation labeling his disclosure as Sensitive Security Information (sensitive but unclassified information).

Continue Reading...

Whistleblower buzz on the Daily Kos

There are two new articles on the Daily Kos inspired by today's Senate committee hearing on the proposed Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (WPEA). The first, by Michael German, is called, "Why Protect Whistleblowers?" Michael is the ACLU Policy Counsel on National Security, Immigration and Privacy.  His article explains how a few whistleblowers did connect dots before the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and how protecting them would enhance our national security.

Jesselyn Radack wrote the other article, called, "Whistleblower Bill Hearing Today & Why We Should Give a Damn." She concludes that federal employees, "need the right to a jury trial in federal court." Both articles are recommended reading. I notice that "Winnie" has asked what action can we take to support the Whistleblower Protection Act? For those who cannot come to Room 342 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building at 2:30 pm today, I provide this link to the National Whistleblower Center Action Alert.