Appropriate Use of Science in Public Policy

Professionals for the Public InterestOn October 27, 2010, Professionals for the Public Interest (PftPI) will present a panel discussion on the "Appropriate Use of Science in Public Policy." Although the event will be free, registration is required. The event will be held at 4:00 pm at the American Association for the Advancement of Science Auditorium, 1200 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C.

Here is PftPI's description of the panel topic:

The federal government relies on scientific studies to craft regulations intended to protect the health and safety of American workers, the general public, and our environment. But amid charges of ideology-driven agendas and politicization of science, already-tenuous public faith in the regulatory process can easily be lost. What can be done to improve the process, to ensure that the widest possible range of knowledge and expertise is utilized, that conflicts of interest and inappropriate influence are minimized, and that science is used appropriately to help inform public policy? This event will explore ways to make the regulatory process more open, consistent, and credible to all stakeholders.

Continue Reading...

Settlement Leaves Seattle Teacher Victorious

On September 22nd, a settlement was reached between Sean Taeschner and the Catholic Archdiocese of Seattle. (See previous blog post on Mr. Taeschner’s case.) The diocese had initiated its own investigation, following the claims made by Mr. Taeschner. The auditor hired by the diocese, however, confirmed the findings from the previous investigation, after which Principal Wayne Melonson was fired. While the settlement leaves Mr. Taeschner victorious, the schoolteacher stated that pursuing the case was “emotionally, financially, spiritually, and professionally” costly, as he has been unable to secure employment in over two years. Now, with a settlement and job prospects in place, Taeschner would appreciate nothing more than an apology from the diocese. As he stated to Seattle’s KOMOnews, “I know that the church teaches that when you say you’re sorry, you make restitution. They’ve made restitution. It would be nice if they said they’re sorry.” Mr. Taeschner’s victory provides yet another positive precedent for whistleblowers, proving that from faith and persistence, justice can be achieved. 


*Elizabeth Finkelman (a NWC intern) drafted this posting.

NYPD whistleblower promises to keep fighting

It certainly seems counterintuitive that the revelation of misconduct and protection of justice would be sidestepped by one of the nation’s most prominent police forces. Police Officer Adrian Schoolcraft has been suspended without pay from the NYPD for nearly a year, after he revealed extensive corruption and misconduct within the police department. Schoolcraft initially believed that he would receive both gratitude and praise for presenting his information to investigators. Instead, the NYPD forced his institutionalization at the mental ward at Jamaica Hospital in Queens, NY. According to an article issued by New York Daily News, the NYPD cast him as a lunatic because he blew the whistle on supervisors who fudged crime stats, enforced illegal quotas and badgered victims trying to report felonies. Schoolcraft made several audio recordings of his supervisors, which support his claims. Police Officer Adhyl Polanco of the 41st Precinct in the Bronx has also presented similar allegations. However, Officer Schoolcraft recognizes that most officers will never report that they are frequently forced to downgrade felonies to misdemeanor and fulfill summons quotas if they fear retaliation by their supervisors.

Officer Schoolcraft, who is currently engaged in a $50 million federal lawsuit against the NYPD, has no plans to settle his suit. As he told the Daily News, “This is not about money…It’s going to trial and there’s no way around that – the truth has to come out.”  Most whistleblowers feel the same way as Officer Schoolcraft - they are simply trying to do the right thing. For more information on his suit, visit Officer Schoolcraft’s website.  If you are a police officer in need of legal assistance the Attorney Referral Service may be able to assist you.

 *Elizabeth Finkelman (a NWC intern) drafted this posting.

Catholic canonization raises whistleblower issue

Mary MacKillopDavid Gibson has written an article for Commonweal Magazine suggesting that in 1870 Australian Mother Mary MacKillop participated in blowing the whistle on a priest engaged in sexual abuse of children. Pope Benedict XVI has scheduled a canonization for Mother MacKillop on October 17, 2010. She will then be known as Saint Mary of the Cross, and she would be Australia's first native born saint. Gibson suggests that she should be the Patron Saint of Whistleblowers.

Gibson cites a documentary by Australia's ABC television to report that MacKillop had denounced the abuse of children by priests, and suffered excommunication by Bishop Laurence Sheil of Brisbane as a result. Joanna Moorhead of The Guardian has written a similar article. This excommunication is a most famous fact about MacKillop's life, but details about the grounds for it are unevenly reported. Blogger Sherry Weddell has now posted a detailed account of the events occurring during 1870 in Adelaide, Australia, the city where MacKillop established the Sisters of St Joseph of the Sacred Heart. Weddell says that in 1870, some sisters of that monastery reported concerns about Fr. Keating 's sexual abuse of children to Fr. Woods, director of the order. Fr. Woods, in turn, passed the concerns up the chain of command, and Fr. Keating was "disciplined" by means of reassignment to Ireland. Fr. Keating's friend, Fr. Charles Horan, undertook a campaign of vengeance against MacKillop and the Sisters of St Joseph. This campaign succeeded in getting MacKillop excommunicated for a period of months, and in dissolving the Sisters of St Joseph in Adelaide. Weddel also reports, however, that MacKillop was not in Adelaide during 1870, but rather a thousand miles away in Brisbane. It is unlikely that she could have participated in the 1870 whistleblowing from Brisbane -- a two week trip away from Adelaide -- until she returned in 1871. Moreover, Bishop Sheil was also away during 1870, at the First Vatican Council.  On his return in 1871, he was ill and dependent on Fr. Horan. While these facts cast doubt on the role MacKillop could have played in raising the 1870 concerns about Fr. Keating, they do not detract from MacKillop's role as a victim of retaliation. Indeed, even modern whistleblower protections would be ineffective if retaliators had free license to visit harm on those that the true whistleblowers care about. MacKillop and the Sisters of St Joseph still stand as worthy examples of the whistleblower story:  suffering for the sake of speaking truth to power. 

UPDATE: The Catholic Church officially canonized Saint Mary of the Cross on October 17, 2010.

Tags: