Senate Committee marks up and approves a weak WPEA

This morning, the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee (HSGAC) marked up and approved S. 743, the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (WPEA). The WPEA has been pending for years. Its expressed purpose is to strengthen protections for  whistleblowers. As sponsor Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-HI) explained, if whistleblowers are not protected, many would not take the risk to protect public health and national security. Since the 1994 adoption of the Whistleblower Protection Act, the Merit System Protection Board (MSPB) and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals have ruled in favor of only three whistleblowers out of hundreds of cases. Sen. Akaka decried the failure to interpret the law consistent with its purpose. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) also spoke about the "crucial role" that whistleblowers play.

The mark-up hearing took up less than five (5) minutes of the Committee's one-hour hearing. During the hearing, Sen. Akaka announced that he had an amendment to make three changes that he called "minor." He described the amendments as (1) clarifying provisions on non-disclosure agreements, (2) giving the General Accounting Office (GAO) more time to conduct its review of the legislation, and (3) giving the Defense Department access to information and consultation rights in the intelligence provisions. The amendment, and the bill, were both approved by the Committee unanimously, on voice votes. Unfortunately, the text of the amended bill is not presently available to the public. The normal course of business would make the amendment available at www.thomas.gov, but it is not presently listed in the bill's summary and status page. To see the Committee's hearing on the WPEA, go to the 47th minute of the archived video.

The National Whistleblowers Center (NWC) submitted a letter to HSGAC on September 28, 2011. This letter raised twelve concerns and makes suggestions for how to make the WPEA truly effective in protecting federal employee whistleblowers. The Committee did not adopt the NWC suggestions. For example, the bill still contains a new provision allowing MSPB judges to dismiss whistleblower cases without a hearing.

NWC has also released a report called Detecting Waste, Fraud, and Abuse: Protections Needed for Federal Employees. The report details how whistleblowers save taxpayer funds and protect the public health, the environment and our integrity as a nation. Hopefully, further consideration of this bill by the full Senate and House will lead to the improvements. Federal employees need protections that are effective enough to encourage them to come forward.

Oranges and Sunshine, a different kind of whistleblower story

Oranges and Sunshine is a new feature film scheduled for limited release this Friday, October 21, 2011. It is based on the book Empty Cradles by Margaret Humphreys (portrayed by Emily Watson), a social worker in Nottingham, England. Earlier in her career, it was her job to remove babies from loving parents. By 1986, she was leading a group therapy for adults coping with issues arising from their adoptions. Some wanted to find their parents or siblings. One discovered a brother living in Australia. Then another young woman contacted her claiming that she had been taken from her parents in England and transported to Australia where she grew up.

Connecting these two cases, Humphreys begins research that uncovers a decades-long British practice of exporting dependent children. In the 1950's and 1960's, upwards of 130,000 children were deported under the program, about 7,000 to Australia. Humphreys used her personal vacation to travel to Australia with that one woman who so treasured meeting her brother. While there, Humphreys continues her research into the child deportations.

Were this a typical whistleblower story, Humphreys would have received a hostile reaction from her superiors when she started raising concerns about a massive fraud and conspiracy by government officials. Instead, when Humphreys explains her concerns to her supervisor, the supervisor is upset that Humphreys had to use her personal vacation time for her investigation in Australia. The supervisor arranges to assign Humphreys to investigate her own concerns, full time, and starts raising the money to cover her salary and expenses for two years. This is a whistleblower fantasy. Our hero also has a supportive husband, and children who share only a few words about missing their busy mother.

Continue Reading...