Although the Supreme Court refused to hear the case of Murphy v. IRS, the fight is not over! The National Whistleblower Center has issued this Action Alert, urging all supporters to email their Senators and Representatives and tell them to support the Civil Rights Tax Relief Act of 2007.
Click here for more info>>
In an order posted today on the its website, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it will not be hearing the Murphy v. IRS appeal. Although this is a disappointing turn of events, whistleblower and civil rights advocates should continue the fight for tax justice, both in other judicial venues, and in the halls of Congress.
In response to the news, the National Whistleblower Center put out the following press release:
Continue Reading...The Supreme Court Justices were scheduled to have a conference this morning to rule on petitions for certiorari, including in the case of Murphy v. IRS.
We will keep you updated on any developments.
UPDATE: We just received word that the results of the conference will not be revealed until Monday morning. We will let you know as soon as we find out. Check back after the weekend!
The Supreme Court has distributed the Murphy v. IRS case for the Conference to be held on April 18, 2008. The Justices of the Supreme Court will decide on that date whether or not to grant the petition for certiorari filed on behalf of Ms. Murphy. It takes 4 votes to grant a petition.
Keep checking back (or sign up for our RSS feeds) for updates on this issue.
Attorneys working with the National Whistleblower Center have filed the reply brief in response to the Solicitor General’s brief regarding whether certiorari should be granted in a key Whistleblower/Civil Rights tax case that was filed with the Supreme Court by attorneys. The case is Murphy v. IRS, No. 07-802 (Supreme Court).
Click here to view the brief (PDF)>>>
The principal issue is whether the IRS can tax as “income” plaintiffs' court awards for non-physical compensatory damages, such as “make whole” awards for emotional distress and loss of reputation.
The Solicitor General has filed the Government’s brief in opposition to the granting of certiorari in a key Whistleblower/Civil Rights tax case that was filed with the Supreme Court by attorneys working with the National Whistleblower Center. The case is Murphy v. IRS, No. 07-802 (Supreme Court).
The principal issue is whether the IRS can tax as “income” plaintiffs' court awards for non-physical compensatory damages, such as “make whole” awards for emotional distress and loss of reputation.
The case was brought by Marrita Murphy, an environmental whistleblower who won before the Department of Labor, and was awarded only compensatory damages to vindicate her rights under six federal environmental whistleblower statutes, and none of her damages were for lost wages. Murphy filed a tax refund suit when the IRS demanded that she pay taxes on the "make-whole" award.
In its brief, the Government argues that it may tax “make whole” damages to restore personal injury losses for emotional distress and damage to reputation. However, such damages were never considered income or taxed prior to 1996, and Congress has not changed the gross income statute or enacted any tax levying statute to specifically tax compensatory damages. The Government’s argument essentially equates “make whole” compensatory damages for personal injury losses to lottery winnings or windfalls, and ignores that damages for personal injury are not income.
The ruling in Murphy v. IRS will affect thousands of past and future victims of civil rights violations and whistleblower retaliation who are awarded compensatory damages for personal injuries.
Today we learned that the U.S. Government will receive a 30 day extension from the U.S. Supreme Court to file their reply brief in Murphy v. IRS (More on Murphy v. IRS here). This is the Solicitor's second 30 day extension, giving the government until March 17th to file the brief. Maybe they are banking on the luck of the Irish...or possibly they haven't been able to make sense of the Appeals court's decision yet either...
We will keep you posted.
Last month we reported on a key Whistleblower/Civil Rights tax case that was filed with the Supreme Court by attorneys working with the National Whistleblower Center. See Whistleblowers Blog (December 13, 2007). The case is Murphy v. IRS, No. 07-802 (Supreme Court), and the principal issue is whether the IRS can tax as income plaintiffs' court awards for non-physical compensatory damages, such as make whole awards for emotional distress and loss of reputation.
Since the petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on December 13, 2007, the Solicitor General has requested and received an extension of the time for the government to file a response to Ms. Murphy's cert petition. A copy of the Solicitor General's request is available here, and a copy of the order granting the request is here.
**Also, a brief update on the status of the case was reported in today's Wall Street Journal.
The National Whistleblower Center announced today that a major Whistleblower/Civil Rights tax case has been filed with the Supreme Court. The case, Murphy v. IRS, has generated a lot of attention in the past year, and certainly puts forth questions that beg a grant of certiorari.
At the heart of the case is whether the IRS has the constitutional right to tax plaintiffs' court awards for non-physical compensatory damages, such as emotional distress and loss of reputation.
The case was brought by Marrita Murphy, an environmental whistleblower who won her case before the Department of Labor, and was awarded compensatory damages to vindicate her rights under six federal environmental whistleblower statutes. Murphy filed suit when that IRS demanded that she pay taxes on the "make-whole" award.
Murphy v. IRS has the potential to affect thousands of past and future victims of civil rights violations and whistleblower retaliation.
UPDATE 1/16/08: To see the latest on Murphy v. IRS, click here
Interested in issues like this one? Click to subscribe to our RSS feed.
Enter keywords:
How can we help? Any information you provide is considered confidential and will not be shared outside of our organization. Requests for legal assistance are considered strictly confidential / attorney-client privileged.
has more information on the Scott Bloch situation.
on KBR whistleblowers, such as Bunnatine Greenhouse.
who will be speaking there at an ACLU event this week.
is reporting that the MN legislature has introduced whistleblower legislation.
tells an unfortunate, yet typical, tale of whistleblowing in corporate America.
has some good information on Iraq whistleblowers
Highlights the case of Bunnatine Greenhouse, who blew the whistle on billions of dollars of fraud in Iraq contracts...and has suffered the unfortunate consequences
alerting the public to the heroism and risk undertaken by the FAA whistleblowers
of the False Claims Act Corrections Act.
has this article on the Senate Judiciary Committee vote to send the FCA Corrections Act to the Senate floor.
reports that a CDC whistleblower brought attention to high levels of formaldehyde in Katrina trailers
discusses two FCA cases which are helping to shed light on the problems with our Social Security system...and how insurance companies are taking advantage...
has broadened protections for FCA whistleblowers in that state.
has some good news about members of Congress standing up for an environmental whistleblower
about a whistleblower who is suing alleging election fraud and a $4 billion government contract.
who accuse insurance companies of fraud, are trying to have their suit reinstated.
illustrates how weak whistleblower laws have made it impossible for a credible whistleblower, in this case a fired state police officer, to obtain justice.
shows the importance of strong FBI oversight by Congress and the DOJ.
tells of a UPS whistleblower who just settled with the company for over $250,000. To conform with the terms of the settlement, UPS is required to post OSHA whistleblower regulations and "agree not to prevent whistleblowers from coming forward."
covered the Senate Judiciary Comm. hearing on the FCA Correction Act. The WPB reported on it here.
blogged on the need for whistleblower protection provisions in the Consumer Product Safety Legislation.
is finally being reported on. The San Fransisco Chronicle had this story on Feb 8, 2008. The settlement is a result of a nationwide investigation, which prosecutors say revealed that Merck had been overcharging Medicare for perscription drugs. Merck's attorneys call the FCA claims a "disagreement (over) the rules of the Medicaid rebate program."
Lawmakers in the state of Washington are considering strengthening whistleblower protections for state employees.
by Pete Yost on Tuesday 1/29/08. It points out that misconduct in the federal government may pale in comparison to the waste, fraud, and corruption that is occurring at the of state and local levels.
contained this great editorial on whistleblowing.
Has an article about Bassem Youssef titled "FBI Harasses Critic of Anti-Terror Policy"
carries an article about the Murphy v. IRS (whistleblower taxation) supreme court case.
