False Claims Act Correction Act (S.2041) Approved by Committee, Heading to the Senate Floor

As was widely expected, the FCA Corrections Act was quickly approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday, and will now face a fight on the Senate floor. Committee member Charles Grassley, who has been considered to be the father of the modern False Claims Act since resuscitating the law in 1986 , has shepherded the bill this far, with bi-partisan support. We can be sure, though, that the powerful healthcare and defense contracting lobbies will be fighting these reforms tooth and nail, in both the House and the Senate. (The House bill is HR.4854). 


Sign up for our RSS feeds

Committee Vote on S.2041, False Claims Act Correction Act, Rescheduled for This Week

According to the website of the Senate Judiciary Committee, that body will be voting to send the FCA Corrections Act (S.2041) to the Senate floor this Thursday, April 3rd, 2008 @ 10AM.



Senate Committee Schedules Thursday Vote on False Claims Act Correction Act (S.2041)

UPDATE: THE COMMITTEE VOTE ON S.2041 HAS BEEN POSTPONED. AS OF TODAY (3/13/08) AT 2PM IT HAS NOT BEEN RESCHEDULED. MORE INFO WILL BE POSTED AS WE RECEIVE IT...


The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote on S.2041, The False Claims Act Correction Act, in a meeting this Thursday. The bill is designed to reverse key federal court decisions which have undermined the intent of the FCA. This legislation has been championed by committee member Sen. Charles Grassley, and was the subject of a hearing on Feb 27, which I attended and blogged here.

False Claims Act Correction Act (S.2041) Hearing Summary

I attended the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing this morning on the False Claims Act Correction Act of 2007.  Senators Leahy, Specter, Grassley and Durbin all attended intermittently, with Senator Grassley being the only member to attend the entire hearing. The witnesses were :

•    Michael Herz, a Deputy Assistant Attorney General representing  the Justice Department ;
•    Tina Gonter, a Qui Tam whistleblower;
•    John Clark, a former federal judge, now a Qui Tam attorney;
•    John Boese, a corporate attorney, representing the views of the U.S.  Chamber of Commerce.

Although each of the panelists had a distinctly different viewpoint on the False Claims Act, they did agree on one thing: that the FCA – having rooted out $20 billion in fraud since 1986, including $5 billion since 2005 -- is a highly effective fraud-fighting tool and it should be kept that way.  But what should be done to upgrade the law, if anything?

Mr. Herz and the Department of Justice expressed agreement with some of the reforms in S.2041 (such as increasing the statute of limitations to ten years), ...

Continue Reading...

Senate Hearing on False Claims Correction Act This Wednesday

The Senate Committee on the Judiciary has scheduled a hearing this Wednesday on the False Claims Correction Act of 2007, S.2041 (discussed previously here). More details to follow...

UPDATE: Stephen M. Kohn, President of the National Whistleblower Center, has submitted written testimony to the committee to be entered into the record at tomorrow's hearing. View the testimony here.

Attorney General's Office Sheds Light on False Claims Act Investigations

On January 25, 2008, The DOJ issued it's responses to questions posed to former AG Gonzales by the Senate Judiciary Committee on July 24, 2007. Several of these questions dealt with how the DOJ  handles False Claims Act investigations (those questions are found on pages 51-58 of the DOJ letter)

Among the interesting revelations contained in these responses is that the DOJ is currently investigating approximately 1,000 separate False Claims Act allegations, with the following approximate breakdown by issue:

  • Health Care: 630
  • Pharmacuetical: 150
  • Defense Procurement: 135 (30 of which are related to the Iraq War)
  • Other Procurement: 95

The responses also cover issues such as the average amount of time it takes DOJ to intervene in a case, and how erosive judicial decisions (such as Sanders and Rockwell) have hampered the ability of the DOJ to pursue FCA cases.

View the full responses here

Sign up for our RSS Feeds here

Senator Grassley, Others File Briefs in Supreme Court Whistleblower Case

Briefs were filed yesterday in the Supreme Court case Allison Engine Co., Inc. v. United States ex rel. Sanders (Docket no. 07-214). This case will decide whether corporations and individuals who receive government contracts are legally required by the False Claims Act to "present" their claim for payment to a government agency, or if they can evade liability under the FCA by routing these claims through a surrogate, such as a subcontractor.


The Petitioners' and Respondents' briefs were filed yesterday, as well as Amicus briefs, including for the Respondents Amicus Curiae briefs from Senator Grassley and Taxpayers Against Fraud. (Thanks to TAF for these briefs).


View the National Whistleblower Press Release on this issue here

Good Politics: New Jersey Passes False Claims Act

This February 5th is being called "Tsunami Tuesday" as many of the big states line up for primary elections to nominate candidates for President.


Ordinarily we would be urging those of you who are politically active to take advantage of this forum. We’d tell you to call, write or hire a plane to fly a banner. Just do anything to get attention for the False Claims Act during the campaign. We are a little disappointed nobody has asked the candidates to support the False Claims Act Corrections Act at any of the seemingly endless series of snooze inducing debates. What’s one question about fighting fraud mixed in with the You-Tube chatter?


Despite this void there has been a major positive event to highlight before February 5th.


Two of the biggest states at stake on February 5, California, and Illinois, have had their own False Claims Acts for many years. New York just got on board last year. Now, perhaps sensing a tsunami of support for fighting fraud, New Jersey has joined the group. By a unanimous vote in its Senate, The Garden State enacted its own False Claims Act just in time for Feb 5th.


Were the legislators and Governor afraid not to have a False Claims Act on the books when the national press arrived to cover a presidential campaign? Probably not. Probably, the New Jersey Legislature just knew a good thing when they saw one. Now, in addition to the billions collected through the Federal FCA, whistleblowers will be able to fight fraud at the local level.


The political implications of more states enacting these laws should not be dismissed. First of all the False Claims Act is popular. Fighting fraud is the safe place to be if you are voting in any legislature. We need to remind the Congress of that simple fact early and often to push for improvements to the law. Second, the laws enacted at the state level will increase popularity for all the False Claims Acts. It can be hard to get attention for a federal case involving merely millions as opposed to billions of dollars, but at the state level smart politicians/attorneys can make a nice career out of saving their state a few million dollars and fighting fraud. That’s fine with me.

IRS Seeking Public Comment for Whistleblower Regulations

 

For all those interested, the IRS has issued new guidance for claimants under the IRS whistleblower law. They are seeking public comment on the proposed regulations.

See the IRS' proposed rules here.

As stated in section 4 of the document, public comments will be accepted by mail or electronically at Notice.comments@irscounsel.treas.gov.

 

Jason Zuckerman of the Employment Law Group blogs this issue here 

False Claims Act Legislation, HR.4854, Introduced in Congress

Another big legislative announcement! We received word today that the False Claims Act Amendments Act of 2007 has been introduced in the House of Representatives by Congressman Howard Berman. The bill number is HR. 4854.


This bill is designed to be companion legislation for the False Claims Act Correction Act of 2007, which was introduced in the Senate in September of this year by Senators Grassley, Leahy, Durbin and Specter. The legislation is intended to correct loopholes in the False Claims Act, a law which permits private citizens to file suit against contractors who defraud the federal government. 


The NWLDEF and the National Whistleblower Center fully support this legislation, and urge Congressional Leaders to make it a priority when they return from recess.  

$670 Million False Claims Act Settlement from Merck Flying Under the Radar

I would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone that the False Claims Act is supposed to be a Whistleblower law. Something is strange when there's a 670 Million Dollar settlement under this law and it’s actually pretty hard to find out what happened. (The only reports I could find were in the Corporate Crime Reporter and a paragraph five mention in this Associated Press article)


There's a lot of good news in the fact that Merck had to pay this money, but we'll have to wait for all the details because it seems many of the documents are still under seal. False Claims Act Plaintiffs always have a hard time adjusting to the idea that they have to keep their mouths shut to let the Government investigate their claims. In this case, the Government should be congratulated - they got a huge result. Yet one of the points of the law is to deter the type of behavior Merck engaged in, and it's hard to see how keeping the results quiet does that.


We were able to find one court document, the Complaint filed in Nevada under that State's False Claims Act. If that complaint can be believed, and there are 670 million reasons to give it credibility, Merck went about "increasing market share" as they call it, pretty much the way a drug pusher does. Only drug pushers don't get the US taxpayer to underwrite sales.


The complaint filed in Nevada district court outlines a scheme to defraud the taxpayer. Merck essentially gave away their drugs, drugs for chronic conditions, to hospitals so that patients would be dependent on the prescription when they left the hospital. Then Merck charged higher prices when the patient left. Only problem is that by discounting drug away earlier they were supposed to report that as the new price of the drug and re-imburse the government accordingly. Ooops. You can't say the pill is 10 cents in the hospital but costs 2 dollars when the patient leaves and get two dollars per pill from the government which pays the bills each time.


In a special irony, one of the drugs whose "market share" this scheme Improved was Vioxx. So now Merck has more Vioxx liability for that drug's cardiac problems than if they marketed the drug legally. That would almost be funny if it didn't put so many patients' lives at risks.


Anyway, the US Department of Justice is to be congratulated for winning such a huge settlement. The Lawyers who won the case and certainly the Plaintiff who brought it have all earned their reward. I just wish that instead of keeping everything quiet everybody would do a little more bragging. Get all the documents out of seal and tell the world that the False Claims Act works to recover funds stolen from the government even in complex schemes. Let's encourage the whistlebowers to report fraud as the False Claims Act was enacted to do. When you win $670 Million, its time to tell the world.


False Claims Act / Qui Tam FAQ

Warning regarding litigation under the False Claims Act

The False Claims Act has one of the strongest whistleblower protection provisions in the United States. However, it has many complicated components and requirements which can harm any person that pursues such a claim without counsel. Due to the potential for a significant financial recovery, it is usually possible to retain an attorney for such an action. If, after reviewing this section, you believe that you may have an action arising under the False Claims Act and need an attorney, please complete our Attorney Referral Service / Report Fraud Now form.

 


What is the False Claims Act (Qui tam)?

The False Claims Act is 31 U.S.C. Sections 3729 through 3733. Qui tam, under the False Claims Act, allows persons and entities with evidence of fraud against federal programs or contracts to sue the wrongdoer on behalf of the United States Government. In Qui tam actions, the government has the right to intervene and join the action. If the government declines, the private plaintiff may proceed on his or her own. Some states have passed similar laws concerning fraud in state government contracts.


What Actions Are Considered Violations under the False Claims Act?

  • Knowingly presenting (or causing to be presented) to the federal government a false or fraudulent claim for payment 
  • Knowingly using (or causing to be used) a false record or statement to get a claim paid by the federal government 
  • Conspiring with others to get a false or fraudulent claim paid by the federal government 
  • Knowingly using (or causing to be used) a false record or statement to conceal, avoid, or decrease an obligation to pay money or transmit property to the federal government.

Who Can File a Qui tam Action?

Any persons or entities with evidence of fraud against federal programs or contracts may file a Qui tam lawsuit. If the government or a private party has already filed a False Claims Act lawsuit based on the same evidence as you, you cannot bring a lawsuit.


Where Should a Qui tam Action Be Filed?

A qui tam action must be confidentially filed under seal in federal district court in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A copy of the complaint, with a written disclosure statement of substantially all material evidence and information in the plaintiff's possession, must be confidentially served on the U.S. Attorney General and the U.S. Attorney for the district in which the complaint is brought. An action under the False Claims Act must be filed, in camera and under seal. The complaint and its contents must be kept confidential until the seal is lifted. The complaint is not served on the defendant. If the plaintiff violates the provisions of the seal, his or her complaint could be dismissed.


What Are the Civil Penalties Under the False Claims Act?

Violators of the False Claims Act are liable for three times the dollar amount that the government is defrauded and civil penalties of $5,000 to $10,000 for each false claim.

A qui tam plaintiff can receive between 15 and 30 percent of the total recovery from the defendant, whether through a favorable judgment or settlement. To be eligible to recover money under the Act, you must file a qui tam lawsuit. Merely informing the government about the violation is not enough. You only receive an award if, and after, the government recovers money from the defendant as a result of your suit.


What Are the Statutes Of Limitations for Filing a Qui Tam Lawsuit?

Under the False Claims Act, an action must be filed within the later of the following two time periods:

  1. Six years from the date of the violation of the Act; or 
  2. Three years after the government knows or should have known about the violation, but in no event longer than ten years after the violation of the Act.

(One Circuit Court has interpreted the second provision as requiring that the action be filed not later than three years after the qui tam plaintiff rather than the government knows, or should have known about the violation.)


What Are the Whistleblower Protection Provisions in the False Claims Act?

Under Section 3730(h) of the False Claims Act, any employee who is discharged, demoted, harassed, or otherwise discriminated against because of lawful acts by the employee in furtherance of an action under the Act is entitled to all relief necessary to make the employee whole. Such relief may include:

  • Reinstatement 
  • Double back pay 
  • Compensation for any special damages including litigation costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.

You should be aware, however, that the scope of whistleblower protection under Section 3730(h) is an issue that currently divides the courts.

Many states have wrongful discharge or other employment laws that may provide other remedies for such discrimination.

The Statute of Limitation for filing a FCA retaliation case is different then that for filing a qui tam recovery case. Retaliation case must be filed under the statute of limitation applicable to the similar state wrongful discharge action.


What about State False Claims Acts?

Due to the success of the Federal False Claims Act, a growing number of states including New York, California, and Virginia, have enacted State versions of the False Claims Act. These laws permit whistleblowers to recover a “finders fee” for reporting fraud in state, local and municipal contracting.


What about Tax Fraud?

In 2006, Congress amended the Internal Revenue Code to permit whistleblower to obtain a reward for reporting tax fraud.


How can I get help?

If you need to speak to an attorney, you can contact us using the NWLDEF’s Attorney Referral Service / Report Fraud Now form.