Something You Can Do To Help One Soldier This Memorial Day

You can take a few minutes to send a letter of support on behalf of Lieutenant Colonel Darrel Vandeveld. Lt. Col. Vandeveld is a highly decorated member of the U.S. Army Reserve Judge Advocate General Corps  who served in Bosnia, Africa, Iraq and Afghanistan, as both a solder in combat and a prosecutor.  After almost 20 years of courageous service to our country the Army is threatening his ability to retire with honor.  You may be asking yourself why. I know I certainly did.

Lt. Col. Vandeveld served as a prosecutor in the Office of Military Commissions at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba from May 2007 to September 2008. He went to bring “to justice detainees who President George Bush had said were ‘the worst of the worst,’” but eventually left Guantanamo because he concluded that he could not “ethically or legally prosecute” the case he was assigned.  Lt. Col. Vandeveld admits that he arrived at Guantanamo as a “true believer” and brushed off stories of detainee abuse as “hyperbole.” One such case was that of young Afghan Mohammed Jawad.  Jawad informed the court that he was a minor and that he had suffered horrible abuse during his detainment.  Lt. Col. Vandeveld accused Jawad of “exaggerating and ridiculed his story as ‘idiotic’” and “railed against Jawad’s military defense attorney” for being a terrorist sympathizer.

The Lt. Col. thought that he was working on a simple case that would produce a quick conviction and prove that the Guantanamo Military Commissions worked.  Little did Lt. Col. Vandeveld know that he was actually opening Pandora’s box.  He discovered many serious issues including: abusive interrogations, evidence withheld from the defense, judicial incompetence, and confessions coerced through torture.  When Lt. Col. Vandeveld brought these issues to his supervisors they were “harshly dismissive” of his concerns and “on some unspoken level, began to question my [his] loyalty, even though my [his] combat experience exceeded both of theirs combined.”  Lt. Col. Vandeveld made the “enormously painful decision to ask to be reassigned” because he could not “in good conscience continue.”

Following his resignation, Lt. Col. Vandeveld was ordered by the military commission judge to testify for the defense in Jawad’s case. He spoke honestly under oath concerning the constitutional violations committed against Jawad including subjecting him to the sleep deprivation regime, known as the “frequent flier program,” which involved moving him to a different cell 112 times over a 14-day period-an average of once every 2 1/2 hours.  In return for his honesty under oath and the public outrage that followed, the military issued him his first ever negative performance evaluation.
 
Lt. Col. Vandeveld was then subpoenaed in 2009 to testify before Congress regarding the Military Commissions Act of 2009, where he again spoke the truth, stating, "the military commission system is broken beyond repair. Even good faith efforts at revision...leave in place provisions that are illegal and unconstitutional."  He also explained to Congress that trying to revise the commission system “place our men and women in uniform at risk of unfair prosecution by other nations abroad, harm the reputation of the United Sates,....[and] undermine the fundamental values of justice and liberty upon which this great country was founded.”  Instead of taking his testimony seriously, the Army chose to retaliate against Lt. Col. Vandeveld for his courageous stand and also to resume the commissions at Guantanamo with minimal revisions.

Fortunately for Jawad, Lt. Col, Vandeveld’s testimony helped lead to the exclusion of his coerced confession and a federal judge granting his habeas corpus petition and releasing him from detention.  However, just 4 months away from 20 years of outstanding service to our nation, Lt. Col. Vandeveld’s career is in jeopardy. On June 1, a military promotions board will meet, ironically, not to honor or promote Lt. Col. Vandeveld for his courage.  The promotion board will more than likely to refer him to a show cause board where he would be forced to justify his continued service in the Army.

We cannot allow the reputation of a distinguished soldier to be destroyed because he defended the constitution that so many of our men and women have died to protect.  Please take a few minutes before you head out to attend a Memorial Day parade or picnic to send a letter in support of Lt. Col. Vandeveld and forward it to your friends and family.  

 
 

Whistleblower protects public from Army's nerve gas

Bookmark and Share

Nerve gas monitors were inoperative from 2003 to 2005 at the U.S. Army's Blue Grass Army Depot, near Richmond, Kentucky. This week, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) released a 2006 Army Inspector General's report that made this finding.  The failure of the monitors might never have come to light if it wasn't for Donald Van Winkle, a chemical weapons monitoring operator at Blue Grass.  After he tried and failed to get management to correct the problem, he was forced to file a complaint with the Inspector General.

In other findings, the Army's Inspector General confirmed Van Winkle's concerns that:

  •  Leak detectors were improperly removed from inside the igloos holding highly lethal VX nerve gas;
  • As a result, from September 2003 to August 2005 (after Van Winkle came forward), Blue Grass had no means, other than visual observation, to determine whether the odorless, colorless nerve gas was seeping from the rockets in which the agent is stored; and
  • These changes were contrary to Army protocols and safety standards but only minor disciplinary action was taken against the responsible managers.

The Army resisted releasing the Inspector General's report for three years citing an ongoing criminal investigation.  Now the Army is resisting PEER's requests for information about the status of that criminal investigation.

“At Blue Grass, the Army was flying blind in protecting its chemical weapons stockpile,” stated PEER Senior Counsel Paula Dinerstein on the organization's web page. “Incredibly, the Army’s attitude appears to be that since no workers or civilians were killed then no harm no foul.”

 

Bunny Greenhouse Retaliated Against After Testifying To Congress

Last week Bunny Greenhouse testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee in support of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act - H.R. 1507.   Although Bunny was removed from her Senior Executive Service position following her initial Congressional testimony about Halliburton no-bid contracts, she courageously returned to Capitol Hill because she believes that "all employees should be protected from retaliation for reporting waste, fraud and abuse."  Incredibly the Army Corps has once again retaliated against Bunny for exposing the truth.  Within hours of delivering her testimony, Bunny received an email from the Army Corps' Chief of Staff stating that all future testimony before Congress must be submitted for pre-approval by the Army Corps. In response to this unconstituional directive, Bunny has issued a new letter to the American people.  In the letter Bunny asks all Americans to take action to protect federal employees by demanding immediate passage of H.R. 1507.

"When the United States orders its employees to submit to censorship when they are exercising their constitutional right to 'petition Congress for redress of grievances,' it is time to fight back!"  

Click here to read Bunny's new letter and take action now.

Click here to read the National Whistleblowers Center's letter to President Obama concerning the retaliation against Bunny Greenhouse