SIGN UP NOW
Follow the NWC on Twitter!Follow the NWC on Facebook!

This Week on Honesty Without Fear

Tune in today at 5:00pm EDT to Honesty Without Fear on Progressive Radio Network.

One of the most significant impediments for whistleblowers seeking to vindicate their rights is their inability to get lawyers to take their cases. The National Whistleblowers Center is contacted by thousands of whistleblowers a year, and most of them are unable to get any lawyer to take their case. Richard Renner spends the hour providing whistleblowers with guidance on how to sell your case to an attorney, present the key facts that may interest a lawyer in taking on your case, ask the right questions, and get the attention your case deserves.

Submit Your Question to be asked on air during the show or call in to 1-888-874-4888.

 

Missed last week's episode?? You can listen to the podcast.

Blowing the Whistle on Corruption

FBI whistleblower Jane Turner appeared on Fox Business last night to speak about her experience as a whistleblower. After twenty years as a FBI Special Agent, Jane Turner led efforts to force the FBI to provide protection for child sex crime victims on the North Dakota Indian Reservations.  In retaliation for exposing FBI failures within its child crime program, Turner was removed from her position.  Her whistleblower case is still pending. Turner also learned that FBI agents had stolen “souvenirs” from the 9/11 terrorist attack crime scene.  She was fired after reporting the thefts to the Inspector General  A federal jury vindicated her in a historic 2007 verdict in her Title VII discrimination case.

Ms. Turner explained that you have to be blowing the whistle for the right reasons because it places tremendous stress on you and your family. She recommended finding an attorney who specializes in whistleblower law.  If you are considering blowing the whistle on corruption and would like to consult an attorney the National Whistleblower Center Legal Defense and Education Fund may be able to help you.

Special Conference Call for Attorneys Wednesday September 30th

Bookmark and Share


In response to the many requests from our Attorney Referral Service (ARS) members and non-members looking for advice on whistleblower protection cases, the National Whistleblower Legal Defense & Education Fund will hold a two-hour telephone conference call on Wednesday September 30th from 10:00 am – 12:00 pm (EST) conducted by leading attorney experts.  This is the ideal way for attorneys to get answers to your tough questions about whistleblower protection, case strategies, legal remedies and laws.

NWC Special Counsel Dean A. Zerbe was recently added to the faculty for the call to address tax and False Claims Act questions.  Mr. Zerbe was active in Congressional investigations of government waste, fraud and abuse for over 25 years.  Mr. Zerbe left Congress in 2008 where his last position was as Senior Counsel and Tax Counsel on the Senate Finance Committee for Senator Charles E. Grassley. In his work for Senator Grassley, Mr. Zerbe was the driving force behind the drafting and passage of legislation that created the Whistleblower Office at the IRS as well as changes in the tax code that greatly expanded the rewards for tax whistleblowers. In addition, Mr. Zerbe was closely involved with the False Claims Act on behalf of Senator Grassley - who is the author of the modern False Claims Act/Qui Tam.

Faculty also includes Stephen M. Kohn, National Whistleblowers Center (NWC) Executive Director, Michael D. Kohn, NWC President, David K. Colapinto, NWC General Counsel, and Richard R. Renner, NWC Legal Director.

SIGN UP TODAY FOR THIS SPECIAL CONFERENCE CALL OPPORTUNITY!

For more information please click here.

        DATE:    Wednesday September 30, 2009

        TIME:     10:00 am - 12:00 pm (EST)

        COST:    $50 for ARS members
                        $250 for Non-ARS members
   
SPECIAL NOTE: You can join the Whistleblower Attorney Referral Service (ARS) today (1 yr. membership is $195.00) and receive your ARS Member discount by calling us at 202.342.1903, or registering online.

You can sign-up online or mail your check to today:
 MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: NWLDEF
(National Whistleblowers Legal Defense & Education Fund)
Send to: 3238 P Street, NW, Washington, DC 20007

***ARS Members contact Estelle S. Kohn at ek@whistleblowers.org or (202) 342-1903 for the discount code prior to registering online.  Refunds cannot be made after the fact. ***
 

*Faculty Subject to Change
 

Administration's Narrow SOX Interpretation Kills Many Whistleblower Suits

SarbanesOxley Signing

In 2002, Congress passed a sweeping corporate reform bill known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). This legislation was a direct result of the crimes committed by publicly traded companies such as Enron and Worldcom. In drafting the bill, lawmakers wisely recognized that SOX would be meaningless without the "teeth" of a strong whistleblower protection provision. And when President Bush signed the bill, it was hailed as a great day for corporate reform, and for corporate whistleblowers. 


 

Unfortunately (yet predictably), since 2002, the Administration has refused to protect corporate whistleblowers in a manner consistent with SOX. Law professor Richard Moberly's disheartening research indicates that only 3.6% of  SOX whistleblowers have been able to obtain relief through the administrative (Department of Labor) process. The problem lies, partly, in the Administration's attempts to thwart whistleblowers by creating a loophole in the law.


A recent Wall Street Journal article  details how the Department of Labor has adopted an overly narrow interpretation of the SOX. The DOL has taken the absurd position that if you are employed by a subsidiary of publicly traded company, then you are not protected by the whistleblower provisions of SOX. I believe that this is an untenable position, and so do a couple of prominent members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. 


Senators Grassley and Leahy, who were principal sponsors of SOX and are longtime champions of whistleblowers, have begun to take action on this issue. They have sent a sternly worded letter to Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao demanding answers on the Administration's position, which is highly inconsistent with the broad language found in the SOX legislation.


For further information on this issue, please view this letter, written to Senator Arlen Specter by Pittsburgh attorney Jason Archinaco. This letter details the problems with the DOL's misguided policy, and includes attachments, such as the above referenced letter authored by Senators Grassley and Leahy.


Mr. Archinaco is a member of our Attorney Referral Service who represented UBS whistleblower Timothy Flynn.

False Claims Act / Qui Tam FAQ

Warning regarding litigation under the False Claims Act

The False Claims Act has one of the strongest whistleblower protection provisions in the United States. However, it has many complicated components and requirements which can harm any person that pursues such a claim without counsel. Due to the potential for a significant financial recovery, it is usually possible to retain an attorney for such an action. If, after reviewing this section, you believe that you may have an action arising under the False Claims Act and need an attorney, please complete our Attorney Referral Service / Report Fraud Now form.

 


What is the False Claims Act (Qui tam)?

The False Claims Act is 31 U.S.C. Sections 3729 through 3733. Qui tam, under the False Claims Act, allows persons and entities with evidence of fraud against federal programs or contracts to sue the wrongdoer on behalf of the United States Government. In Qui tam actions, the government has the right to intervene and join the action. If the government declines, the private plaintiff may proceed on his or her own. Some states have passed similar laws concerning fraud in state government contracts.


What Actions Are Considered Violations under the False Claims Act?

  • Knowingly presenting (or causing to be presented) to the federal government a false or fraudulent claim for payment 
  • Knowingly using (or causing to be used) a false record or statement to get a claim paid by the federal government 
  • Conspiring with others to get a false or fraudulent claim paid by the federal government 
  • Knowingly using (or causing to be used) a false record or statement to conceal, avoid, or decrease an obligation to pay money or transmit property to the federal government.

Who Can File a Qui tam Action?

Any persons or entities with evidence of fraud against federal programs or contracts may file a Qui tam lawsuit. If the government or a private party has already filed a False Claims Act lawsuit based on the same evidence as you, you cannot bring a lawsuit.


Where Should a Qui tam Action Be Filed?

A qui tam action must be confidentially filed under seal in federal district court in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A copy of the complaint, with a written disclosure statement of substantially all material evidence and information in the plaintiff's possession, must be confidentially served on the U.S. Attorney General and the U.S. Attorney for the district in which the complaint is brought. An action under the False Claims Act must be filed, in camera and under seal. The complaint and its contents must be kept confidential until the seal is lifted. The complaint is not served on the defendant. If the plaintiff violates the provisions of the seal, his or her complaint could be dismissed.


What Are the Civil Penalties Under the False Claims Act?

Violators of the False Claims Act are liable for three times the dollar amount that the government is defrauded and civil penalties of $5,000 to $10,000 for each false claim.

A qui tam plaintiff can receive between 15 and 30 percent of the total recovery from the defendant, whether through a favorable judgment or settlement. To be eligible to recover money under the Act, you must file a qui tam lawsuit. Merely informing the government about the violation is not enough. You only receive an award if, and after, the government recovers money from the defendant as a result of your suit.


What Are the Statutes Of Limitations for Filing a Qui Tam Lawsuit?

Under the False Claims Act, an action must be filed within the later of the following two time periods:

  1. Six years from the date of the violation of the Act; or 
  2. Three years after the government knows or should have known about the violation, but in no event longer than ten years after the violation of the Act.

(One Circuit Court has interpreted the second provision as requiring that the action be filed not later than three years after the qui tam plaintiff rather than the government knows, or should have known about the violation.)


What Are the Whistleblower Protection Provisions in the False Claims Act?

Under Section 3730(h) of the False Claims Act, any employee who is discharged, demoted, harassed, or otherwise discriminated against because of lawful acts by the employee in furtherance of an action under the Act is entitled to all relief necessary to make the employee whole. Such relief may include:

  • Reinstatement 
  • Double back pay 
  • Compensation for any special damages including litigation costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.

You should be aware, however, that the scope of whistleblower protection under Section 3730(h) is an issue that currently divides the courts.

Many states have wrongful discharge or other employment laws that may provide other remedies for such discrimination.

The Statute of Limitation for filing a FCA retaliation case is different then that for filing a qui tam recovery case. Retaliation case must be filed under the statute of limitation applicable to the similar state wrongful discharge action.


What about State False Claims Acts?

Due to the success of the Federal False Claims Act, a growing number of states including New York, California, and Virginia, have enacted State versions of the False Claims Act. These laws permit whistleblowers to recover a “finders fee” for reporting fraud in state, local and municipal contracting.


What about Tax Fraud?

In 2006, Congress amended the Internal Revenue Code to permit whistleblower to obtain a reward for reporting tax fraud.


How can I get help?

If you need to speak to an attorney, you can contact us using the NWLDEF’s Attorney Referral Service / Report Fraud Now form.

 

Environmental Whistleblowers FAQ

What Federal Laws Protect Environmental Whistleblowers?

Seven major federal environmental laws (Clean Air, Toxic Substances, Clean Water, Atomic Energy, Solid Waste, Safe Drinking Water and Superfund) have special provisions protecting employee whistleblowers.


Who Is Protected?

Almost any private sector or federal employee can be protected.


Who Can File a Complaint?

Any employee who believes he or she has been discriminated against in retaliation for "blowing the whistle" on a safety problem or environmental violation, or for engaging in other activity protected under the law.


What is Illegal Discrimination?

Adverse changes to the whistleblower's terms and conditions of employment are prohibited. This includes a wide range of actions from reprimands to terminations and blacklisting.


Where Should I File a Complaint?

These laws are administered by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). Complaints must be filed in writing and should be mailed to:

U.S. Department of Labor
Office of the Assistant Secretary
Occupational Safety and Health Administration - Room: S2315
200 Constitution Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20210
(202) 693-2000


What Are the Statutes Of Limitations?

A Complaint under six of the environmental statutes must be filed with the DOL in writing within 30 days of the time an employees learns that he or she will be, or has been, subjected to discrimination, harassment or retaliation.


Do Other Laws Protect Whistleblowers?

Many states have enacted laws to protect whistleblowers. Most of these laws have a longer statue of limitations and other benefits unavailable under federal law.

Federal Whistleblower Laws and RegulationsThe National Whistleblower Center, as a matter of public service, has published a compilation of all Federal laws and regulations protecting whistleblowers. This book is available on the National Whistleblower Centers' publication site as a free download for whistleblowers and their political and legal advocates. Donations are recommended, and commercial users are required to purchase the book for $120.

 

 

What remedies are available to employees under the environmental whistleblower statutes?

Employees who prevail are entitled to:

  • Reinstatement
  • Backpay with interest
  • A complete “make whole” remedy (including restoration of seniority/sick leave, etc)
  • Compensatory damages (for emotional distress and loss of professional reputation)
  • Attorneys’ fees and costs
  • Affirmative Relief” (such as requiring a letter of apology and formal posting of the decision)

Sarbanes-Oxley FAQ

What Federal laws protect whistleblowers who report corporate fraud?

In 2002, Congress passed the historic Sarbanes-Oxley Act which protects employees of publicly traded companies who report violations of Securities and Exchange Commission regulations or any provision of federal law relating to fraud against the shareholders.


Who is protected?

Employees of publicly traded companies and contractors, subcontractors, and agencies of publicly traded companies.


What is “protected activity?”

The Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower law broadly defines protected activity to include reports made to federal regulatory and law enforcement agencies, Congress, an employee’s supervisor, internal corporate investigators. The law also protects employees who participate or testify in SEC regulatory proceedings or other federal proceedings related to fraud against shareholders.


What is illegal discrimination?

Adverse changes to the whistleblowers terms and conditions of employment are prohibited. This includes a wide range of actions from reprimands to termination and blacklisting.


Where should complaints be filed?

U.S. Department of Labor
Office of the Assistant Secretary
Occupational Safety and Health Administration - Room: S2315
200 Constitution Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20210
(202) 693-2000


What is the statute of limitations?

A complaint filed under the SOX whistleblower law must be filed with the Department of Labor in writing within 90 days of the time an employee learns that he or she will be, or has been, subjected to discrimination, harassment, or retaliation.


What remedies are available to employees under the Sarbanes Oxley whistleblower law?

Employees who prevail are entitled to

• Reinstatement
• Backpay with interest
• a complete “make whole” remedy (including restoration of seniority/sick leave, etc)
• “Special Damages” (for emotional distress and loss of professional reputation)*
• Attorneys’ fees and costs
• “Affirmative Relief” (such as requiring a letter of apology and formal posting of the decision)

*If an employee is seeking “special damages,” that relief should be requested in their initial complaint.


Do other laws protect corporate whistleblowers?

Concepts and Procedures in Whistleblower LawMany other federal and state laws have been enacted laws to protect whistleblowers. The National Whistleblower Center has produced several publications which outline these laws, some of which are offered as free downloads for whistleblowers and their advocates. For more information, visit the NWC publication page.

 




Also, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration operates an informative site for whistleblowers here.