SIGN UP NOW
Follow the NWC on Twitter!Follow the NWC on Facebook!

IRS On Verge Of Crippling Whistleblower Program

Whistleblower Advocates Submit Extensive Comment  in Response to Proposed IRS Regulations

Yesterday, the National Whistleblower Center ("NWC"), the National Whistleblowers Legal Defense and Education Fund ("Fund"), Bradley Birkenfeld, Scott Rosen, and Gene Ross jointly submitted a comprehensive 84-page comment on the IRS's proposed rules for its whistleblower office (26 CFR Part 301 [Reg-141066-09]).  Click here to view their comment.

The critical issues addressed in the joint submission include: 

  • IRS rules that would severely restrict the scope of the IRS whistleblower program by limiting "collected proceeds" to violations of Title 26 only. The joint comment states that the statute was intended to cover all violations enforced by the IRS, even if they are in Title 31 or Title 18. A strong whistleblower program is needed to prevent tax fraud related to offshore banking.

  • The proposed IRS rules seek to define "related action" in an unreasonably and arbitrarily narrow manner. The NWC's position is that whistleblowers that provide information about a type of tax shelter or other complex transaction that the IRS would not have proceeded on otherwise, should receive an award for all proceeds collected as a result of that information.

  • The joint submission further states that the IRS needs to set reasonable deadlines for administrative action, both to encourage whistleblowing and to increase accountability. The IRS should promulgate regulations adopting and expanding on the guidelines in Commissioner Miller's June 20, 2012 Memorandum.

Dean Zerbe, the NWC's Senior Policy Analyst who also represents tax whistleblowers such as Bradley Birkenfeld, released the following statement in regard to the proposed rules:

"I appreciate the time and energy that the IRS put into these proposed regulations. However, the proposed regulations are the beginning not the end.  My hope is that the IRS will listen closely to the whistleblower community and that we can at the end of the day have final regulations that are based on the plain language of the statute and meet the policy goals of Congress of encouraging whistleblowers to come forward by providing them awards based on the information they provide.  It is the honest taxpayers of this country that will benefit from having a successful whistleblower program in place that helps the IRS address those engaged in tax evasion." 

Stephen Kohn, Executive Director of the NWC and who also represents Birkenfeld and other tax whistleblowers stated, "The future of the IRS Whistleblower program is on the line. The final rules will either encourage employees to risk their careers to do the right thing, or they will create a straight jacket over the law thus thwarting its effectiveness."

The National Whistleblowers Center encourages U.S. Tax-payers to submit comments on the proposed rules. Click here to learn how.

IRS Whistleblowers Received Record Payouts in 2012, But Future Recoveries At Risk

The Internal Revenue Service Whistleblower Office announced that it paid a record $125.4 million in 2012 to whistleblowers that provided evidence of tax cheating, but new rule changes place future recoveries at risk.  The IRS report, which was made public on Wednesday, stated that more than 80 percent of the total paid out by the IRS in 2012 went to Bradley Birkenfeld, a former employee of UBS AG who received $104 million.

In total, the IRS issued 128 whistleblower rewards for the 2012 fiscal year, though just 12 of those cases involved more than $2 million in unpaid taxes.  Whistleblowers helped the IRS collect more than $592 million.  

However, proposed rules to the IRS whistleblower law are drawing criticism from the NWCU.S. Sen. Grassley and others. The IRS’s proposed rules will make it harder for whistleblowers to collect awards and limit the scope of cases that qualify for awards. 

The IRS is seeking public comment until Feb. 19 on the proposed rules. You can learn more about the issues that are being criticized and submit a comment by clicking here.

The National Whistleblower Center has criticized the IRS whistleblower program for moving too slowly and being given inadequate resources, causing whistleblowers to grow reluctant to file claims, Here and Here.  

The IRS Report indicated that the number of taxpayers coming forward to report tax fraud has declined in the past two years.

Senator Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, a vocal critic of the problems at the IRS Whistleblower Office, called the report's low number of new whistleblowers "alarming" in that it showed a drop and leveling off in the number of whistleblowers coming forward for the past two years. Sen. Grassley further stated in his response to the IRS report:

“Instead of rushing to raise new revenue through tax increases, as the President wants, the government should work with whistleblowers to collect taxes that are due under current tax levels. I’m concerned that the delay in awards and the way the IRS treats whistleblowers might be contributing to the leveling off of whistleblower cases.  Unfortunately, the regulations proposed in December are likely to contribute to a drop-off in whistleblowers coming forward. The IRS has made some progress in processing and tracking claims, but whistleblowers are still left in the dark for years. The IRS needs to do a lot more to give whistleblowers the confidence they need to take the risk of coming forward to expose tax fraud.”

2012's 10 Big Moments for Chief Compliance Officers


By Guest Columnist: Donna Boehme

Principal at Compliance Strategists LLC and editor of the weekly CS Newsflash (and former chief compliance and ethics officer at two leading multinationals). Follow her on Twitter @DonnaCBoehme.

Originally Published in Corporate Counsel (January 14, 2013)

 

As companies head into 2013 facing yet another year of increasing and complex compliance and ethics challenges, here’s a threshold question for the Board of Directors: Does your chief compliance officer have the empowerment, independence, seat at the table, line of sight, and resources to do the job?

Following is a “boardworthy” sample of big developments from 2012 that should give some boards and C-suites (and you know who you are) pause:

1. Morgan Stanley Declination

Companies and CCOs have been waiting a long time to see public recognition and credit for a preexisting compliance program. In 2012, the U.S. Department of Justice decided not to prosecute Morgan Stanley for flagrant FCPA violations by an employee in China, citing robust compliance program elements that illustrated the firm’s strong efforts to prevent and detect wrongdoing. It was just like the Federal Sentencing Guidelines contemplate, and a powerful “show and tell” example for CCOs to discuss with management and boards. More like this in 2013, please.

2. Wal-Mart Mexican Bribery Scandal

Unpack many of the big corporate scandals of the last five years and very few feature a strong, well-positioned, empowered, and experienced CCO voice in the C-suite. (Actually, I can’t think of any, but please write and tell me if you can). In Wal-Mart’s case, the compliance function reported to the legal department, but according to The New York Times reportage, the company’s top lawyer participated in a C-suite decision to “hush up” a too-hot investigation by sending it back to the very same Mexican GC who allegedly approved the bribes in the first place. It was a decision that ignored a compliance officer’s strong recommendation for an expanded independent investigation. Wal-Mart is Exhibit A for an independent, empowered CCO.

3. PwC Survey Shows Increased CCO Independence

According to the 2012 PricewaterhouseCoopers State of Compliance study, the number of CCOs reporting to GCs fell by 6 percent—to 35 percent from 41 percent—in the prior year. CCOs reporting to CEOs held steady at 32 percent. This is momentum in the right direction and is consistent with the 2010 amendments to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which favor “direct reporting obligations” to the board or its independent committee. According to Keith Darcy, the ECOA’s executive director, “A clear, unfiltered CCO voice in the C-suite is key to a robust program. Without independence, a CCO is mere window-dressing and false security for the board."

4. Madoff’s Brother and CCO Pleads Guilty to Fraud, Gets 10-Year Sentence

Did you know that Ponzi scheme king Bernie Madoff’s brother Peter was also the firm’s chief compliance officer? Oh yeah, I’m not making that up. He’s in jail now, serving a 10-year sentence. Lack of independence is rarely this obvious, but it is incumbent on boards and management to recognize empowerment and independence issues in all their nuanced appearances. Note to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Please add “the CCO is the CEO’s brother” to your list of red flags. And add “independence” to the list of CCO requirements. Thank you.

5. Joint DOJ/SEC FCPA Resource Guide on Adequate Autonomy for CCO (and Incentives)

The widely anticipated Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Resource Guide, issued jointly by the DOJ and SEC, may not have broken new ground—but for CCOs it validated many best practices already in place in the field (ahem, use of incentives in programs- ahem) and also expressly tracked the language of the 2010 OECD Good Practice Guidance on Internal Controls, Ethics, and Compliance, which noted that the CCO must have “adequate autonomy from management” in order to do the job. The Justice Department has been using this language in individual FCPA settlement agreements since 2010, going beyond the letter of the current Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations.

6. Big Milestones for the C&E Profession

In 2012, the Ethics and Compliance Officer Association, the first industry association for C&E professionals, marked its 20th anniversary—a significant milestone for the profession. Also this year, the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics, an industry association that traces its founding to 2002, earned its 3,000th member, making it the largest cross-industry compliance and ethics organization, and its annual meeting attracted over 1,000 attendees for the first time. In addition, the SCCE’s sister organization, the Health Care Compliance Association, passed the 8,000-member mark. These important milestones signal the vitality, increased profile, and continued growth of the rapidly evolving profession.

7. HSBC Settlement Agreement Elevates and Empowers CCO

I would make the DOJ settlement agreement with HSBC (for widespread anti money-laundering violations and failure to maintain any semblance of a compliance program) required 2013 reading for boards, if I had that power. The case is notable for many reasons, but CCOs will recognize all manner of glaring missteps in how the firm positioned and structured its compliance function. HSBC has now “elevated” its CCO by separating compliance from the legal function, adding resources, fixing the line-of-sight, and creating levels of independence. And one more thing I’ve never seen before: the CCO was expressly raised to the level of the top 50 employees of the firm. Now that’s what I call a seat at the table. As SCCE CEO Roy Snell said “The real question is, will industry give independence to the compliance officer before the government mandates independence through regulatory action as they have with auditors.” Time will tell.

8. Enforcers Tally a Record $9 Billion in Corporate Settlement Agreements, Warn Boards and Management

As Joe Warin of Gibson Dunn puts it, the “B word”—corporate settlements levied by federal enforcers with totals in the billions—are almost the “new norm.” The 2012 total of $9 billion dwarfs the previous 2006 high of $3 billion. With 35 NPAs and DPAs in 2012, across a broad spectrum of industries, CCOs have significant new input to add to the existing guidance for compliance programs, many of which include positioning, structure, and resources of the compliance function. As Gibson Dunn advised its clients: “Make no mistake: while not formally labeled as such, DOJ and other regulators appear to be promulgating compliance guidance for various industries through the remedial requirements included in the DPAs and NPAs used to resolve real-world cases.” In 2012, officials made a number of public statements and speeches urging boards and management to “elevate the role of compliance” by supporting their CCOs with “adequate resources, independence, standing, and authority” to be effective. Boards and management should take heed.

9. Greg Smith’s Very Public Goldman Sachs Resignation, General Services Adminstration, et al—It’s the Culture, Stupid

In 2012, organizational culture hit the headlines. Greg Smith wrote about it in his spectacular “take-this-job-and-shove-it” New York Times op-ed (key word: “muppets”). And social media was abuzz over photos of Jeff Neely, the former head of the General Services Administration, in a taxpayer-funded hot tub with two glasses of wine at the ready. And don’t get me started on those wild and crazy Secret Service parties in South America. The 2012 RAND Symposium report also zeroed in on this “missing link” in its examination of compliance programs at a crossroads. Of course this is all preaching to the CCO choir.

10. The Year of the Corporate Whistleblower

By the end of 2012, it was clearly the year of the corporate whistleblower on a number of fronts. False Claims Act recoveries totaled over $9 billion, more than double the previous year, including the largest health care fraud settlement in history—a $3 billion settlement paid by British drug maker GlaxoSmithKline. After a slow start to its 2007 whistleblower program, the Internal Revenue Service also paid out at least two eye-popping bounties, including $104 million to former UBS banker Bradley Birkenfeld. Companies continue to scramble to respond to the new Dodd-Frank whistleblower program, which provides a direct line to the SEC for allegations of fraud, and a potential bounty of 10 to 30 percent for penalties collected over $1 million. With 3,001 whistleblower tips in its first year and its first bounty paid in 2012 (and reportedly many more in the pipeline), the new Dodd-Frank whistleblower program is now officially alive and kicking. With so much at stake, companies that fail to empower their CCOs could pay a steep price.

And there you have it. After the chief compliance officer was named 2011 Person of the Year by former federal prosecutor Michael Volkov, who recognized the CCO as the “unsung hero” of the corporate workplace, CCOs made strides in 2012. And that’s a good thing, with 2013 promising to be no less fraught with peril for the overseer of the company compliance and ethics program. As Machiavelli wrote, “There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things."

Donna Boehme is an internationally recognized authority and practitioner in the field of organizational compliance and ethics, designing and managing compliance and ethics solutions within the U.S. and worldwide. As principal of Compliance Strategists LLC, Boehme is the former group compliance and ethics officer for two leading multinationals and currently advises a wide spectrum of private, public, governmental, academic, and nonprofit entities through her NJ-based consulting firm.

 

The Undeniable Truth About Corporate Misconduct and Whistleblowers

By Guest Columnist: Donna Boehme
Principal at Compliance Strategists LLC and editor of the weekly CS Newsflash (and former chief compliance and ethics officer at two leading multinationals). Follow her on Twitter @DonnaCBoehme.

Originally Published in Corporate Counsel (September 20, 2012) 


Last week’s outsized bounty award of $104 million to former UBS AG banker-turned-whistleblower Bradley Birkenfeld has commentators lighting up the Twitterverse with outrage and the Wall Street Journal calling Birkenfeld’s tale one of “sordidness piled on sordidness.” Seems his 2007 testimony regarding thousands of U.S. tax dodgers netted the Internal Revenue Service a $780 million fine and the names of 5,000 potential tax cheats from the Swiss banking giant—not to mention potential recovery of over $5 billion in unpaid taxes.

This has resulted in what one of Birkenfeld’s lawyers has called "the largest whistleblower reward issued to a single individual.” What has got so many folks’ knickers in a wad is not just the record-setting, eye-popping monetary reward, but the fact that Birkenfeld himself had a spectacular role in the scheme, at one point famously smuggling diamonds for a client in a tube of toothpaste. And what’s more, he lied to the IRS and served 30 months in jail before collecting his reward. Judging by much of the commentary, this is being seen by many as whistleblower protection gone horribly awry and the end of civilization as we know it.

As a former chief compliance officer who has been in the trenches for 20-plus years, I’d like to offer an alternative view, starting with some undeniable truths about whistleblowers (and, by the way, we need another term for individuals who report misconduct, but I digress.) To all the outraged commentators, please have a glass of Pinot and unwad your knickers. Go ahead, I’ll wait.

OK, on to the undeniable truths about corporate whistleblowers:

UNDENIABLE TRUTH NO. 1

Whistleblowers are not always model citizens (gasp). Sometimes they are very close to the misconduct—that’s how they know about it. This is the same reason that in developing the Dodd-Frank whistleblower program, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission declined to exclude whistleblowers involved in the misconduct unless criminally convicted: it makes no sense to automatically exclude the people most likely to have the information. Ever heard of the U.S. Department of Justice’s antitrust leniency program?

UNDENIABLE TRUTH NO. 2

Whistleblower bounty programs help create a level playing field. Without these programs, the deck is always stacked against the mere mortal employee or regulator slaving away in the trenches trying to unravel the facts. The large, well-resourced financial institution holds all the cards (and the data). But the introduction of large financial rewards creates incentives for others, such as plaintiffs law firms (or in some cases, hedge funds investing in a whistleblower case for a percentage of the bounty), to support a whistleblower and thus even the score. Harry Markopolos is, no doubt, well versed in Undeniable Truth No. 2 [PDF].

UNDENIABLE TRUTH NO. 3

Sometimes it takes a thief to catch a thief. Who better to unravel the mysteries of complex business misconduct than a whistleblower steeped in the nuances, tricks, and practices of the fraudulent scheme? Wal-Mart’s alleged massive Mexican bribery scheme, which was splashed across the headlines earlier this year, wasn’t uncovered by a regulator or a compliance officer, but by the ex-Wal-Mart executive who for years was allegedly at the center of the bribery-palooza. See Undeniable Truth No. 1.

Ultimately, all whistleblower bounty cases, whether under the False Claims Act, Dodd-Frank, or IRS programs, are a form of “whistleblower arbitrage.” If companies do not seriously root out misconduct through their internal compliance programs, then someone else probably will. However unpalatable the whistleblower, and however ridiculously large and undeserved the bounty may appear, misconduct left on the table will likely be disclosed for profit. Sometimes a very, very big profit. Time will tell whether that becomes Undeniable Truth No. 4.


Reprinted with permission from the September 20, 2012 edition of Corporate Counsel© 2012 ALM media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved. Further duplication without permission is prohibited. For information, contact 877-257-3382 or reprints@alm.com or visit www.almreprints.com .

This Week on Honesty Without Fear

Tune in today at 5:00pm EDT to Honesty Without Fear on Progressive Radio Network.

In the first half, Richard Renner and Dr. Patricia Harned, President of the Ethics Resource Center (ERC), discuss the findings of the ERC's recently-released report on whistleblowing. The report, "RETALIATION: When Whistleblowers Become Victims," found that, "not only is retaliation on the rise nationally, it is rapidly becoming an issue even at companies with a demonstrated commitment to ethics and integrity."

In the second half, Lindsey Williams interviews Steve Kohn about the case of UBS whistleblower Bradley Birkenfeld. Tune in to find out why his prison sentence was unjustified, why the IRS awarded him $104 million, and why a presidential pardon is essential to stopping illegal offshore banking.

Submit Your Question to be asked on air during the show or call in to 1-888-874-4888.

 

Missed last week's episode?? You can listen to the podcast.

Washington Times and FSN discuss importance of The Handbook

Why is Bradley Birkenfeld serving a forty-month prison sentence for giving up his career in private banking and netting billions of dollars in lost tax revenue for American taxpayers?

The answer was simple, according to Birkenfeld’s lawyer and the Executive Director at the National Whistleblowers Center, Stephen M. Kohn. His mistake was walking into the wrong office in Washington DC, the criminal division of the US Department of Justice.

Kohn said the most important step in cases where ordinary citizens step forward to reveal fraud is “who you blow the whistle to and what you say.”

 The Washington Times discusses The Whistleblower’s Handbook: A Step-by-Step Guide to Doing What’s Right and Protecting Yourself, Stephen M. Kohn’s newest released book. The article notes some of the book’s contents such as information on viewing “hotlines” with discretion.

Feature Story News (FSN) Reporters Blog also posted about The Whistleblower’s Handbook, explaining that ways to attain generous rewards for uncovering wrong-doing are revealed in the book.

The Whistleblower’s Handbook is the blueprint whistleblowers need to be prepared from day one.

To purchase the book, please visit the NWC Store.

 

Links: 

The Washington Times "Whistleblowing handbook points up some serious pitfalls" (PDF version)

 

*Sabeen Khanmohamed (a NWC intern) contributed to this posting

 

 

UBS Banker, Bradley Birkenfeld, blew the whistle on Credit Suisse

In June 2007, UBS whistleblower Bradley Birkenfeld revealed detailed information about high-profile individuals and banks, including Credit Suisse, to the United States Justice Department and Internal Revenue Service. Today, World Radio Switzerland (WRS) released their interview with Stephen M. Kohn, Birkenfeld’s attorney and Executive Director of the National Whistleblowers Center.  WRS also released their interview with other renowned whistleblower advocates such as Jesselyn Radack, former Justice Department Ethics Advisor, and Edward Robbins, an attorney specializing in tax controversies.

WRS reports that while he was working in Switzerland, Birkenfeld uncovered fraudulent activities of at least four Credit Suisse bankers who were helping Americans evade taxes and hide their assets.  The list includes senior manager in Credit Suisse American Operations, Marco Parenti Adami.  Currently, Bradley Birkenfeld is serving 40-months in prison.

Stephen M. Kohn said:

“He turned in information about the bank [Credit Suisse] to the Justice Department including the identities of persons who are now subject to criminal indictment.”

In response to the U.S. Justice Department’s three and a half year delay, former Justice Department Ethics Advisor Jesselyn Radack says, “it is more for show” and that justice should not just be selective.

The U.S. Justice Department refuses comment but Credit Suisse is cooperative with, and not a target of, the investigation.

Listen in on Daniel Ryntjes’ report
 

*Sabeen Khanmohamed (a NWC intern) contributed to this posting

CNBC Airs Whistleblower Series "Bounty Hunters"


CNBC is airing a special series by Eamon Javers entitled "Bounty Hunters" this week. You can watch Mr. Javers' report on Tuesday, February 8 and Wednesday, February 9, on "Squawk Box", "Squawk On The Street", and "Power Lunch." On Thursday, February 10 and Friday, February 11, he will report on "Squawk Box" and "Squawk On The Street."

Mr. Javers interviewed NWC Executive Director, Stephen M. Kohn and UBS whistleblower Bradley Birkenfeld, among others. This series is very timely in light of the rulemaking currently in progress for implementing the Dodd-Frank whistleblower provisions. I look forward to watching the rest of the pieces.

Father of UBS Whistleblower Makes Personal Thanksgiving Day Plea for Son's Clemency

Today, Ronald Birkenfeld, father of UBS whistleblower Bradley Birkenfeld, made a personal Thanksgiving Day appeal to President Barack Obama for his son to be released from prison.

In his letter to the President Mr. Birkenfeld stated, "His separation from his loved ones is extremely painful to our family, especially when we know that his sentence is harsher than that of any of the thousands of wrongdoers." Ronald Birkenfeld sadly noted that "the thousands of US citizens with offshore accounts who were granted amnesty will be sitting at home with their families," while his son "who was solely responsible for recovering billions of dollars for American taxpayers" is "sitting alone in a cold cell away from those who love and appreciate him."

The National Whistleblower Center is supporting Bradley Birkenfeld's clemency petition and encourages every American to take a minute out of their day on Thanksgiving to send a letter to President Obama asking him to return Mr. Birkenfeld to his family in time for Christmas.

Stephen M. Kohn, Executive Director of the National Whistleblower Center, issued the following statement: "Given Bradley Birkenfeld's contribution to the public interest, it is a national disgrace that he must spend Thanksgiving in prison. Birkenfeld was responsible for taxpayers recovering $780 million in fines paid by UBS bank. His disclosures lead to over 15,000 Americans turning themselves in under the IRS amnesty program. These tax evaders escaped prison, but paid the U.S. taxpayers back billions of dollars. Birkenfeld, who voluntarily returned to the United States to blow the whistle, is the only UBS banker to be convicted of a crime and he has already served more time in prison than all of the 19,000 millionaires and billionaires who illegally hide their money combined." 

Links:

Ronald Birkenfeld letter to President Obama

Ronald Birkenfeld letter to the American public

Bradley Birkenfeld's official clemency page


****

Whistleblower Disclosures Result in Historic International Treaty

The Swiss parliament finally approved the deal made between UBS and the U.S. government that requires UBS to turn over the names of 4,450 U.S. citizens who held accounts at the Swiss bank. The NWC issued the following release:

 
Washington D.C. June 17, 2010. In an unprecedented move the Swiss parliament voted to approve a deal between the Department of Justice (DOJ) and UBS in which UBS has agreed to turn over the names of 4,450 U.S. citizens who held secret and illegal bank accounts at UBS.
 
Lindsey M. Williams, Director of Advocacy and Development of the National Whistleblowers Center, said:
 
"Today's news is bittersweet. While the Swiss government will finally be releasing the names, the outcome is far from a fairytale ending for taxpayers...

 

The agreement with UBS was only for a small portion of the names of tax cheats and the fine was a drop in the bucket compared to the entire $20 billion dollar illegal program.  In order to overcome the damage done by the Department of Justice's prosecution of the whistleblower, Bradley Birkenfeld, the IRS and President Obama should follow the intent of the law and issue Mr. Birkenfeld his reward and immediately commute his prison sentence."

 
Stephen M. Kohn, Executive Director of the National Whistleblowers Center and attorney for Bradley Birkenfeld, said:
 
"Bradley Birkenfeld is the most important fraud whistleblower in American history resulting in one of the largest collections ever, but the deal cut with UBS permits the majority of violators to get off scot-free.  The message from the Birkenfeld case should have been: if you illegally shelter the money you will get caught, if you turn in fraud you will be rewarded. Instead, the message being sent by the Justice Department and UBS is clear: if you get caught your wrist will be mildly slapped, if you turn it the fraud you will go to jail."
 
Dean Zerbe, co-counsel for Mr. Birkenfeld said, "Getting the swiss to agree to release the names is taking more dance steps then Fred Astaire. Clearly going forward the answer has to be for the IRS to work with whistleblowers and the information they provide and not wait for the swiss to finish their tap dancing."

The National Whistleblowers Center urges all members of the public to send letters in support of Mr. Birkenfeld's clemency petition, which is pending before the Pardon Attorney.
 
Links:
 
 
 ###