Whistleblower Protection Blog

Whistleblower Protection Blog

Advocating Whistleblower Rights for over Twenty Years

Tag Archives: corporate whistleblower

Big Win for Whistleblowers in U.S. Court Of Appeals for The Fourth Circuit

Posted in Corporate Whistleblowers, News
Big Win for Whistleblowers in Fourth Circuit  Washington, D. C. May 24, 2016. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit ruled in favor of a corporate whistleblower in a May 20, 2016 decision. The case, filed under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by Mrs. Dinah R. Gunther, alleged that the Virginia-based software provider, Deltek, Inc. fired her after she raised accounting concerns to the company’s General… Continue Reading

Obama Administration Proposes Oversight Reform in Response to Panama Papers

Posted in Corporate Whistleblowers, International, News, Tax Whistleblowers
Official White House Photo by Pete SouzaIn response to the Panama Papers — the more than ten million leaked documents from the Panamanian law firm, Mossack Fonseca, that exposed illicit financial activity and tax evasion through the use of anonymous offshore shell companies — the White House announced on May 6th that it would end the use of anonymous corporations in the United States and require… Continue Reading

SEC Annual Report Highlights Success of International Whistleblower Program

Posted in Corporate Whistleblowers, International
SEC Whistleblower Program SuccessWashington, DC, November 16, 2015.  The SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower issued its annual report today highlighting the successes of the Office.  This includes payments of more then $37 million to whistleblowers in 2015 and a 30% increase in the amount of claims filed with the office.  The SEC also took enforcement action to ensure that corporations stop using restrictive… Continue Reading

SEC Says Employees Protected For Internal Whistleblowing

Posted in Corporate Whistleblowers
SEC Says Employees Protected For Internal WhistleblowingOn August 4, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued an interpretive rule to dispel confusion over whether employees who only report violations to their employer are protected by the Dodd-Frank whistleblower protection provision. The SEC will formally publish this interpretative rule in the Federal Register and it will operate as an amendment to the Dodd-Frank whistleblower rules. A… Continue Reading

State Supreme Court Holds Arguments In UBS Whistleblower Case

Posted in Corporate Whistleblowers
The Hartford Courant reports that the Connecticut state Supreme Court heard arguments on March 24, in a whistleblower case brought by a fired UBS worker.  The issue in dispute is whether an employer can discipline its employees for making internal reports about corporate wrongdoing. According to the report, UBS lawyers argued that employers should be able to fire employees who make internal… Continue Reading

KBR’s Confidentiality Agreements Draw Congressional Scrutiny

Posted in Corporate Whistleblowers, Uncategorized
Today, Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, Ranking Member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and Rep. John F. Tierney, Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on National Security, sent a letter to the CEO of KBR, one of the nation’s largest government contractors, requesting documents relating to the company’s treatment of potential whistleblowers seeking to report wrongdoing at the company. The… Continue Reading

Washington Post Reports: SEC Investigating KBR

Posted in Corporate Whistleblowers
According to a March 11 report by The Washington Post, the Securities and Exchange Commission has opened an investigation into Halliburton’s former subsidiary, Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR). KBR is the largest American contractor operating in Iraq and Afghanistan, responsible for $40 billion worth of federal work. The Washington Post reports that the SEC is looking into the claims that KBR… Continue Reading

SEC Whistleblower Awards List Updated

Posted in Corporate Whistleblowers
The SEC Office of the Whistleblower post Notices of Covered Action where a final judgment or order, by itself or together with other prior judgments or orders in the same action issued after July 21, 2010, results in monetary sanctions exceeding $1 million.Subject to the Final Rules, individuals who voluntarily provided the Commission with original information after July 21, 2010 that led to… Continue Reading