Administration's Narrow SOX Interpretation Kills Many Whistleblower Suits

SarbanesOxley Signing

In 2002, Congress passed a sweeping corporate reform bill known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). This legislation was a direct result of the crimes committed by publicly traded companies such as Enron and Worldcom. In drafting the bill, lawmakers wisely recognized that SOX would be meaningless without the "teeth" of a strong whistleblower protection provision. And when President Bush signed the bill, it was hailed as a great day for corporate reform, and for corporate whistleblowers. 


Unfortunately (yet predictably), since 2002, the Administration has refused to protect corporate whistleblowers in a manner consistent with SOX. Law professor Richard Moberly's disheartening research indicates that only 3.6% of  SOX whistleblowers have been able to obtain relief through the administrative (Department of Labor) process. The problem lies, partly, in the Administration's attempts to thwart whistleblowers by creating a loophole in the law.


A recent Wall Street Journal article  details how the Department of Labor has adopted an overly narrow interpretation of the SOX. The DOL has taken the absurd position that if you are employed by a subsidiary of publicly traded company, then you are not protected by the whistleblower provisions of SOX. I believe that this is an untenable position, and so do a couple of prominent members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. 


Senators Grassley and Leahy, who were principal sponsors of SOX and are longtime champions of whistleblowers, have begun to take action on this issue. They have sent a sternly worded letter to Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao demanding answers on the Administration's position, which is highly inconsistent with the broad language found in the SOX legislation.


For further information on this issue, please view this letter, written to Senator Arlen Specter by Pittsburgh attorney Jason Archinaco. This letter details the problems with the DOL's misguided policy, and includes attachments, such as the above referenced letter authored by Senators Grassley and Leahy.


Mr. Archinaco is a member of our Attorney Referral Service who represented UBS whistleblower Timothy Flynn.

Department of Labor Whistleblower Cases

Nuclear Whistleblowers FAQ

What Federal Laws Protect Nuclear Whistleblowers?

Whistleblowers in the nuclear power and nuclear weapons industries are specifically protected under section 211 of the Energy Reorganization Act.


Who Is Protected?

Private sector employees and federal employees working for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or the Department of Energy.


Who Can File a Complaint?

Any employee who believes he or she has been discriminated against in retaliation for "blowing the whistle" on a nuclear safety problem.

Nuclear Whistleblowers


What is Illegal Discrimination?

Almost any adverse change to the whistleblower's terms and conditions of employment is prohibited. This includes a wide range of actions from reprimands to terminations and blacklisting.


Where Should Complaints Be Filed?

These laws are administered by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). Complaints must be filed in writing and should be filed with the local OSHA Office of the DOL and/or mailed to:

U.S. Department of Labor
Office of the Assistant Secretary
Occupational Safety and Health Administration - Room: S2315
200 Constitution Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20210
(202) 693-2000


What Are the Statutes Of Limitations?

A nuclear industry employee filing a complaint under the Energy Reorganization Act must file within 180 days.


Do Other Laws Protect Whistleblowers?

Many states have enacted laws to protect whistleblowers. Most of these laws have a longer statue of limitations and other benefits unavailable under federal law. If an employee is reporting fraud by a government contractor, these concerns may be covered under the False Claims Act. To report these concerns, please fill out our confidential Attorney Referral / Report Fraud Now form.


Can I file in Federal Court?

The Atomic Energy Act was recently amended to permit employees to file claims in federal court if the DOL fails to issue its final decision within one year.


What remedies are available to employees under the Sarbanes Oxley whistleblower law?

  • Reinstatement
  • Backpay with interest
  • A complete “make whole” remedy (including restoration of seniority/sick leave, etc)
  • Compensatory damages (for emotional distress and loss of professional reputation)
  • Attorneys’ fees and costs
  • “Affirmative Relief” (such as requiring a letter of apology and formal posting of the decision)

Exemplary damages are available under the Safe Drinking Water Act and Toxic Substances Control Act.

To view a major decision on damages in a nuclear case, see Hobby v. Georgia Power Co.