SIGN UP NOW
Follow the NWC on Twitter!Follow the NWC on Facebook!

Maine judge issues a fine order for attorney fees

Last week, Justice Joyce A. Wheeler of Maine's Androscoggin Superior Court issued an excellent decision awarding attorney fees in Maine Human Rights Commission v. Saddleback, Inc., Case No. CV-06-219 (Dec. 17, 2009, Order Regarding Attorneys Fees). The case arose when electrician Robert Duggan raised concerns about the ski resorts use of unlicensed electricians who improperly installed a power line. Read more about his case in my blog entry from last July.  Last June, Duggan prevailed in a jury trial on his statutory whistleblower claim, but not on his tort claims. In the present order, Justice Wheeler held that the two claims were "so interrelated that attempts to allocate hours between claims may be unwarranted." She also noted that the defendants' conduct produced "an indivisible injury" and the defendants would be jointly and severally liable for the attorney fees. After Saddleback complained that Duggan's attorney spent too much time conferring with the lawyer for the Human Rights Commission, Justice Wheeler found that, "these conferences led to a division of work so as to avoid duplication." She also found that the attorney's time records adequately described the time spent.  Duggan's attorney, Rebecca Webber, requested $79,777, Justice Wheeler awarded judgment for all of it.

The decision should encourage attorneys to take whistleblower cases that rely on attorney fee awards provided by statute.  Too many whistleblowers have difficulty getting attorneys to take their cases, in part because too many judges have looked for ways to cut attorney fee awards.  Justice Wheeler understood the personal risk attorney Webber took on by accepting the case of a fired electrician, and her decision advances the cause of all whistleblowers who need dedicated legal representation to vindicate their rights and the public's safety.

Maine Supreme Court holds Saddleback liable for electrician's discharge

Bookmark and Share


The Maine Supreme Court has issued a memorandum opinion holding the Saddleback Ski Resort liable for its role in the discharge of an electrician who blew the whistle. Electrician Robert Duggan, Jr., blew the whistle on Saddleback's use of its maintenance crew to install a high-voltage electric line. Duggan reported that Saddleback was using unlicensed electricians for the work, and that they made the installation unsafe by failing to make proper connections and grounds.

Saddleback argued that it should not be liable for Duggan's discharge since it was not his direct employer.  The Court disagreed, noting the Maine law makes an employer liable if it was was "aiding, abetting, inciting, compelling or coercing another" to cause the adverse action.

 
Auburn attorney Rebecca S. Webber represented Duggan.  Webber told the Morning Sentinel that this is Maine's first case establishing that non-employers are liable for their actions causing another employer to retaliate.  This is a common problem for whistleblowers in the construction trades.  The subcontractors who actually employ the workers may not have the same resources as other entities up the line.  In Maine, at least, employers cannot hide behind layers of contractors, and they will have to answer for their own retaliation against whistleblowers.
 
The case is Maine Human Rights Commission et al. v. Saddleback, Inc., et al., Case No. And-08-640, Mem 09-128.