SIGN UP NOW
Follow the NWC on Twitter!Follow the NWC on Facebook!

Senate Whistleblower Bill called "Bride of Frankenstein"

Julia Davis, a notable whistleblower who prevailed in her struggle against the Department of Homeland Security, recently released an article concerning the reintroduction of the Senate version of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (S. 743). Ms. Davis notes that one of the main supporters and architects of the current law to protect federal employees, the Whistleblower Protection Act, has referred to it as a “Frankenstein” and how the reform bill (WPEA, S. 743) that is intended to correct the current law, is dangerously close to becoming the “Bride of Frankenstein.” Ms. Davis concisely explains how S. 743 is “replete with deceptive guillotines masquerading as haircut machines” and includes most of the problems that were in the prior version of the bill (S. 372) from last Congress. For example, the Senate bill gives the Merit Systems Protection Board new powers to summarily dismiss a whistleblowers case, allows for an extremely limited right to seek a jury trial in federal court for a small number of employees, and lacks meaningful protections or court access for national security whistleblowers.

Ms. Davis along with the National Whistleblowers Center, Federal Ethics Center, National Security Whistleblowers Coalition, No FEAR Coalition and numerous citizen activists publicly opposed prior efforts to pass a whistleblower bill just for the sake of saying that a bill was passed. In December of 2010, we pointed out seven major flaws or shortcomings in the predecessor Senate WPEA bill, S. 372, that failed to pass the last Congress. 

When the WPEA was reintroduced in the Senate in April of 2011 as S. 743, the Senate sponsors agreed to fix one of the most glaring problems with the bill. Convincing the Senate to make this one important change was no small feat, particularly when powerful Washington lobbyists and groups were working feverishly behind the scenes to urge Congress to pass the badly flawed bill without making any corrections so they could claim a legislative victory. In the face of those odds we prevailed in forcing the Senate to make one truly important change to the WPEA. That was only possible because thousands of citizen activists responded to the call to pressure Congress to correct this problem with the bill.

However, our work is not done. The Senate has only fixed one of the seven major problems with the bill. If we truly want the WPEA to be a true enhancement and not an illusory reform then additional improvements and changes to the bill are needed.

President Obama promised true reform, and court access for all federal employee whistleblowers, during his campaign and we still expect him to fulfill his promise.

Citizen activism does the impossible: One WPEA loophole closed

Yesterday, Senator Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii) introduced the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2011 (WPEA), S. 743. Stephen M. Kohn, Executive Director of the National Whistleblowers Center (NWC) issued the following statement on this bill:Stephen M. Kohn

In December of 2010, the National Whistleblowers Center (NWC), the Federal Ethics Center, the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition and the No FEAR Coalition, together with nationally respected whistleblowers and thousands of citizen activists, strongly opposed the prior version of the WPEA (S. 372) calling it a "bad deal for whistleblowers." We laid out seven detailed reasons for why the bill would be detrimental for federal employees and would roll back existing whistleblower protections.

We were strongly criticized for opposing S. 372. We were told that this was the best bill we were going to get and if we did not change our position federal employee whistleblower protections offered in the new Congress would be worse. However, we believed that we were doing what was in the best interest of all federal employee whistleblowers and refused to back down.

Federal employees deserve better and were promised more by President Obama. If the flawed S. 372 had passed in December, all federal employees would have been materially harmed by the roll backs in protections. We had no choice but to stand our ground and it turns out that we were right - changes could be made to improve the bill.

The WPEA was re-introduced yesterday with one of our major concerns fixed. The exception for "minor" and "inadvertent" violations of law in the definition of protection disclosure has now been removed from this latest version of the Senate bill.

We are pleased that the Senate sponsors of the WPEA have agreed with the NWC, the Federal Ethics Center, the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition and the No FEAR Coalition, and the thousands of persons who advocated for this important change in the bill from what was proposed in the last Congress.

As a result of this change, if it is passed, federal employees would be protected for disclosing any violation of law. This is a major victory for the thousands of citizen activists who responded to our action alerts last year even though there was intense pressure to pass the bill without making any improvements. Everyone who participated in this advocacy should recognize that his or her voice can make a difference.

We appreciate and thank Senator Akaka and the co-sponsors of the WPEA for making this change.  However, we still believe that other important changes are needed to ensure that this bill does not harm existing rights and that it provides effective and workable protections for federal employee whistleblowers and, ultimately, the U.S. taxpayers.

The legal staff of the National Whistleblowers Center is carefully reviewing S. 743. As we said in December, this is an important piece of legislation that will intimately affect federal employees for a generation and it is critical that it be done right. While some progress has been made to improve the legislation over last year's version, other concerns we raised about last year's bill remain unaddressed by S. 743. For example, the Senate's new WPEA bill still provides the Merit Systems Protection Board with sweeping new powers to dismiss whistleblower cases without a hearing and to act as gatekeeper for court access. 

We look forward to working with the House and Senate to address our other concerns with this legislation.

Links:

NWC Letter to House and Senate Sponsors of WPEA (December 13, 2010) on the roll back in the definition of protected disclosure

Joint Statement - S. 372: A Bad Deal for Whistleblowers

Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2011 (S. 743)