Bad Apples in a Rotten Barrel

 In the United Kingdom, a former investigator of the Royal Military Police (RMP), speaking anonymously, alleges that Senior British army commanders in Iraq refused to investigate Iraqi civilian abuse claims. According to BBC News on October 11th, the whistleblower claims that while he has seen documentary evidence of hundreds of incidences, involving death and serious injury to Iraqis, investigators could not examine these cases because the whole system of military justice is flawed. The military chain of command made independent investigations of the RMP almost impossible by not providing resources or denying access.  

 

 The Ministry of Defense, however, insists “any substantive allegations of abuse brought to its attention will always be investigated and that such cases are relatively rare.” A Ministry of Defense statement claims “we must remember that over a hundred thousand of our personnel served in Iraq and, with the exception of a few individuals, they have performed to the highest standards under extraordinarily testing condition there.”

The whistleblower agrees “the vast majority of British soldiers have served their country with distinction.” However, he asserts “it is the actions of a few who have been shown to be bad apples. But the system is so flawed and some of the decision making has been so perverse that it is fair to say that the barrel is probably rotten.”       

Referred Articles:

Bowen, Innes, “Whistleblower says Army abuse not investigated,” BBC News, October 11, 2009.

“Army abuse claims ‘being ignored’,” BBC News, October 11, 2009.

Evans, Michael, “Army refused to investigate Iraqi abuse claims, investigator claims,” Times Online, October 12, 2009.

“Whistleblower bemoans British ‘abuses’ in Iraq,” Press TV, October 12, 2009.

 

Whistleblowing Information of the U.K.

 

Public Interest vs. Breach of Nursing Code of Conduct

In Britain, Margaret Haywood’s whistleblowing became a hot issue again last week after the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) decided that her secrete filming was a “major breach” of the nursing code of conduct.   Ms. Haywood, a nurse at the Royal Sussex Hospital in Bringhton, secretly filmed neglectful behavior of nurses toward elderly patients in the hospital.  The purpose of her film was to inform the public about how badly the nurses treated their patients.  A social investigative TV program in BBC, Panorama, aired her film in July 2005.

After the program broadcasted, the conditions in the hospital improved for patients.  However, Ms Haywood lost her job and nursing license because she violated patient confidentiality rules.  Two weeks ago, the NMC confirmed that her filming was a breach of the nursing code of conduct.  After the NMC decision, British news media and citizens criticized the decision and British whistleblowing policy.  Thousands of people have signed a petition in support of Ms. Haywood.  On April 27, 2009, the Panorama program in BBC broadcasted a new episode, “Who’d be an NHS Whistleblower,” about Ms. Haywood’s whistleblowing and British whistleblower protection. 

Even though Britain has a comprehensive law for whistleblower protection (The Public Interest Disclosure Act), Haywood’s case shows the protection might not be enough and whistleblowing is not a pleasant job at all. 


You can find more about British whistleblower protection on the International Page of the National Whistleblowers Center by clicking here.

Articles about Haywood’s case

“Hospital Care Fails Elderly,” BBC News, July 19th, 2005.
James, Cathy, “When the Whistle Blows,” The Guardian, April 25th, 2009.
“Call to Protect Whistle-blowers,” BBC News, April 27th, 2009.
Staines, Richard, “Whistleblower Petition Gets 25,000 Signature, Nursing Times, April 28th, 2009.