SIGN UP NOW
Follow the NWC on Twitter!Follow the NWC on Facebook!

Evans wins remand from ARB

My client, Doug Evans, just won a remand from the Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board (ARB). In a rare en banc decision, all five ARB judges joined in holding that Iqbal and Twombly do not apply to OSHA whistleblower complaints. Thus, the ARB's 2010 decision in Evans' case is finally overruled.  The ARB also made clear that Evans' decision to initiate the OSHA process is itself protected, and his employer cannot retaliate against him for having commenced his original whistleblower complaint.

Douglas Evans (left in photo, with me) was an employee of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in Las Vegas, Nevada, for 17 years. He was a technician who repaired equipment. EPA managers in Las Vegas were under pressure to get a high rate of their employees to “volunteer” for emergency response work. Evans recalls getting an order to participate. He wrote a letter to the EPA Administrator, and his supervisors never forgave him for it. Evans' letter complained about the lack of training for the emergency response work, and about other aspects of the plan. Doug Evans and Richard RennerI recognized that a concern about lack of training for emergency response work is an environmental concern. I filed Evans' complaint with OSHA under the federal environmental laws. Shortly thereafter, Evans' bosses fired him on trumped up charges. I filed a supplemental complaint against the discharge. OSHA dismissed. I requested a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). I asked for discovery from EPA. EPA made a motion to dismiss, and to stay discovery while its motion is pending. I opposed the motion to dismiss, citing the DOL's rule that there is “no particular form of complaint.” I also provided statements from Evans' co-workers supporting his complaint, and explained how the discharge in retaliation for his first OSHA complaint is certainly protected. Still, the ALJ dismissed the case, and in 2010 the ARB has affirmed. Evans petitioned for review to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  During that review, the ARB issued its landmark decision in Sylvester v. Parexel International, ARB Case No. 07-123 (ARB May 25, 2011), Evans had submitted an amicus brief in the Sylvester case, explaining how the Iqbal standard had been so harmful to his whistleblower case. The Solicitor of Labor agreed that Evans' case should be returned to the ARB for reconsideration, and the Ninth Circuit agreed. Back at the ARB, the Solicitor of Labor filed a brief in support of Evans. Now we finally have the ARB's reconsideration.

Judge Brown's dissent makes some important points for whistleblowers and practitioners who face motions to dismiss before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). He notes that the majority's discussion of how ALJ's can handle motions to dismiss is "but dicta." Page 19. He finds that the majority "cites neither statutory nor regulatory authority prescribe new procedures by which ALJs are now to resolve motions seeking dismissal of whistleblower retaliation complaints for failure to state a claim for relief." Page 20.  Thus, whistleblowers and their lawyers can cite to this concurring and dissenting opinion in response to any motion to dismiss, and preserve an issue for which the Department of Labor will be poorly equipped to refute on further review.

Judge Corchado explains what he will be looking for in reviewing complaints.  To allege protected activity, he wants Evans to allege "facts about what activities his co-workers might be expected to do and why Evans believed that such acts would violate one or more of the environmental laws." Page 18. "Not much is required," he adds on page 19. It is a lesson about the importance of making clear exactly what is the whistleblower's protected activity.

The case is Evans v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, ARB No. 08-059, ALJ No. 2008-CAA-3 (ARB July 31, 2012), Decision and Order of Remand.

Occupy DC Occupies EPA

Occupy EPAActivists from Occupy Washington DC on Freedom Plaza marched to the headquarters of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) yesterday. Billed as "Occupy EPA," the event called on the EPA to do its job to protect Americans from toxic pollution.

The march had a decidedly pro-whistleblower theme as we marched from Freedom Plaza to EPA headquarters. Led by Dr. Margaret Flowers, marchers chanted, "Hey hey, NO FEAR, blow the whistle at EPA." With EPA whistleblower Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo, we blew whistles and passed out cards to passersby. The cards asked, "Do you know something that could save a life or help the planet? Do you want to report it?" The cards then provided links to whistleblower web sites, including that of the National Whistleblowers Center. The marchers rallied on Federal Triangle, in front of the office of EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson. There, Dr. Coleman-Adebayo led us in reading the text of the NO FEAR Act.

Supporters plan to march to the EPA and rally on Wednesdays. Meet at 12 noon at Freedom Plaza, 13th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. For more photos, follow the link to the continuation of this blog post.

Dr. Margaret Flowers calls us together at Freedom Plaza:

 

"I had a job, now I have an occupation"

I had a job

 

Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo marching

 

Stop killing the planet

Here is the card we gave out:

Environmental whsitleblower card

 

Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo reads the NO FEAR Act

More media cover NWC's call for new leadership at EPA's OCR

Our call to Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to oust her newly appointed director of the EPA's Office of Civil Rights (OCR) is gaining new media attention.

Today, the Black Agenda Report ran an article I wrote about the civil rights problems at EPA. This article is also now linked by the Coalition for Change.

Also, I appeared as a guest today on KBOO's Talk Radio with Lisa Loving in Portland, Oregon.  KBOO promotes this show saying:

Marsha Coleman Adebayo has protested racism within the Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Civil Rights -- can you believe it? -- and finally the agency says it's investigating. Have you ever tried to draw attention to a big, bad situation in your workplace? Whistleblowers--how they impact your life and what they risk in coming forward. My guest this morning on Kboo 90.7 FM is Richard Renner, legal director of the National Whistleblowers Center. That's Wednesday morning at 8 am on kboo.fm, Portland.

This episode is now available as an mp3 file through KBOO's podcast. The talk show format gave me an opportunity to talk about many of NWC's activities, and our new book, The Whistleblower's Handbook. Notice in the final quarter of the call-in show how I confused Bradley Manning with Bradley Birkenfeld.

Hopefully, this growing public attention to an OCR director who does the opposite of civil rights will prompt EPA leadership to respond positively to our call, and soon.

EPA tells POLITICO it will investigate DeLeon

POLITICO reporter Robin Bravender released a story on Friday saying that EPA spokesperson Brendan Gilfillan promised that EPA would "look into" the allegations of the open letter the National Whistleblowers Center released last week. Gilfillan told Bravender that Jackson is “deeply committed to issues of environmental justice, civil rights and a healthy workplace for all.” NWC's open letter alleges that Rafael DeLeon, director of EPA's Office of Civil Rights, made a series of offensive remarks. These remarks called Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo and Susan Morris "pink elephants." Bravender reports that this term "was popularized by Sarah Palin, who used it to refer to a stampede of women outraged about policies in Washington." NWC also alleges that DeLeon said Dr. Coleman-Adebayo  held herself out like the "Rosa Parks of EPA," and that he referred to a lapdance at an office party.

Dr. Coleman-Adebayo is an environmental whistleblower who raised concerns about the dangers of vanadium mining in South Africa. When her concerns focused on the role of U.S. companies in apartheid South Africa she became the victim of a hostile work environment. Ms. Morris raised concerns about EPA’s compliance with the Civil Rights Act and then suffered a removal from her supervisory position.

Bravender interviewed Dr. Coleman-Adebayo about her experience working for DeLeon. Dr. Coleman-Adebayo reported that her transfer to DeLeon's office was essential a set up to be discharged.  Dr. Coleman-Adebayo is writing a book about her experiences at the EPA. Called, “No Fear: A Whistleblower's Triumph Over Corruption and Retaliation at the EPA,” it is due in September.

Bravender reports that when Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), released the Deloitte Consulting report which finds problems with OCR, she praised DeLeon for his "energy and experience." Jackson appointed DeLeon to direct OCR last December.

Bravende's story is

available

on-line to subscribers of POLITICO Pro.

NWC calls on EPA to oust Civil Rights Director

Today I am writing to Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and asking her to remove Mr. Rafael DeLeon, the Director of the EPA's Office of Civil Rights (OCR). Last month, Deloitte Consulting issued a report on OCR finding that it is essentially dysfunctional. It fails in its core responsibility of protecting civil rights. Moreover, since Deloitte issued its report I have learned that OCR's director, Mr. DeLeon, recently made disparaging remarks about two courageous women whistleblowers "pink elephants." One of these women is, Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo, a board member of the National Whistleblowers Center and founder of the No-FEAR Coalition. Mr. DeLeon singled her out for purporting to be "the Rosa Parks of the EPA" in an EPA conference call last week. It was not enough that Mr. DeLeon fired Dr. Coleman-Adebayo from the EPA. Finally, we received a report of Mr. DeLeon referring to a "lap dance" at a party with EPA employees. This behavior is incompatible with EPA's civil rights obligations.  Accordingly, I have issued an open letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson calling on her to remove Mr. DeLeon. In the continuation of this blog, you can read NWC's press release, and the full text of my open letter.

PRESS RELEASE

NWC Calls on EPA to Oust Civil Rights Director

Washington, D.C. April 20, 2011. Today, the National Whistleblowers Center released an open letter to Lisa Jackson the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the racial and sexual discriminatory conduct of the newly appointed director of the EPA's Office of Civil Rights (OCR), Rafael DeLeon and calling for his immediate dismissal.

A recent Deloitte Consultant Report found that the EPA's Office of Civil Rights was essentially dysfunctional. However, the person hired to "fix" the office, Mr. DeLeon, has had numerous complaints filed against him by women. In fact, Mr. DeLeon fired former EPA employee and NWC Board of Director's Member Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo.

The NWC was alerted that during a recent Agency-wide conference call, Mr. DeLeon bragged about actions taken against two senior female civil rights leaders and called the women by the derogatory term "pink elephants." During the same conference call, Mr. DeLeon also attempted to humiliate and destroy the reputation of Dr. Coleman-Adebayo by disparagingly referring to her as "the Rosa Parks of EPA."

Richard Renner, Legal Director of the National Whistleblowers Center called Mr. DeLeon's denigration of the late Rosa Parks "irreverent and inexcusable" and demonstrates "his utter contempt for the women named and the 9,000 women currently serving in EPA's labor force."

The letter explains additional improper actions by Mr. DeLeon.

Mr. Renner called for immediate action by EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson:

In light of the Deloitte Report and the disclosures here about Mr. DeLeon's behavior and remarks, you must make a pivotal decision about the direction of EPA's OCR. We call on you to make a clean break from the past. We call on you to make a decision that visibly rejects discrimination, retaliation, and intimidation. We call on you to bring in fresh air and create an atmosphere where any conscientious employee can raise concerns about waste, fraud, abuse and discrimination. We need your decisive leadership to end the paralysis of silence.

Links:

April 20, 2011 Open Letter to EPA

Deloitte Consultant Report

 


 

Open Letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson
“Pinks Elephants” and “Rosa Parks?”

 

April 20, 2011

Administrator Lisa P. Jackson
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20460


Dear Administrator Jackson,
 
The Office of Civil Rights (OCR) under your administration has failed.  As its name suggests, OCR should be at the forefront of eliminating discrimination and advancing civil rights and liberties within the Agency. Instead of taking positive actions to correct the endemic problems, your newly appointed director, Rafael DeLeon, has exemplified a continuation of the old mode of denying that any problems exist and defending management. The recent Deloitte Consultant Report on the civil rights program described OCR as essentially dysfunctional.  Yet, the very man placed in the office to “fix it,” is someone that numerous women have filed complaints against. During a recent MSPB hearing, under oath, Mr. DeLeon stated that he could not “remember” how many complaints had been filed against him. OCR’s dysfunctionality undercuts the ability of EPA employees to seek redress after experiencing discrimination or warning the public about serious violations.  Our communities will ultimately bear the cost. EPA employees are discouraged from raising concerns about toxic waste from the Gulf Oil spill that was dumped in a poor black community. They will have to think twice before complaining about the CHEERS program where EPA partnered with industry to conduct experiments on children. You have sent a clear and unmistakable message that the status quo is firmly in place and anyone who dares to blow the whistleblower or complain about discrimination will find a hostile Office of Civil Rights.  

It has come to our attention that during a recent Agency-wide conference call, Mr. DeLeon bragged about actions taken against two senior female civil rights leaders, calling them “pink elephants.”  As you are no doubt aware, the term “pink elephant” was popularized during the last presidential election. The pink elephant refers to disrespectfully to women who are characterized as pitbulls with lipstick. Mr. DeLeon’s use of this term exhibits a negative stereotyping of women. The term is particularly offensive to minority women who go against stereotyping of both race and gender when they deviate from expectations of submissiveness. If Mr. DeLeon actually said this, the President, Congress and the public have a right to know whether you still associate yourself with this derogatory, demeaning and sexist name calling. We further understand that Mr. DeLeon also denigrated the name of the late Rosa Parks. In an attempt to humiliate and destroy the reputation of NWC Board Member Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo, Mr. DeLeon referred to her disparagingly  as “the Rosa Parks of EPA.” For admirers of Ms. Parks, this comment is irreverent and inexcusable. These words demonstrate his utter contempt for the women named and the 9,000 women currently serving in EPA’s labor force. If Mr. DeLeon actually made these statements, we must know if he represents you and the Agency?

We have an additional concern that at a recent in-house party at which Mr. DeLeon1 served liquor, it was reported that Mr. DeLeon made an off-color, sexist joke.  A woman accidentally sat in his chair.  He allegedly responded by saying that had he sat down on her, he would probably be accused of  ‘lap dancing.’  A woman had the courage to tell him that she found his comment inappropriate.  Ms. Jackson, the public has a right to know whether Mr. DeLeon still holds your confidence.

In the context of these events, your decision to assign Rafael DeLeon as the Agency point person for No FEAR training is particularly troublesome. We recall that after a jury returned a verdict in favor of Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo in an historic judgment against the EPA, Congress passed the No FEAR Act to increase accountability on matters of civil rights.  Numerous courageous EPA employees suffered for their support of the No FEAR Act.  Patricia Lawson fought for the passage of the No FEAR Act after filing numerous complaints against EPA discrimination. The resulting stress took her life. Your appointment of Mr. Rafael DeLeon to lead No FEAR training raises serious concern about whether EPA is committed to making the reforms required by the Deloitte Report. Your decision to appoint the man who fired Dr. Coleman-Adebayo to lead No FEAR training clearly aligns management with the side of perpetuating the past.

In light of the Deloitte Report and the disclosures here about Mr. DeLeon’s behavior and remarks, you must make a pivotal decision about the direction of EPA’s OCR. We call on you to make a clean break from the past. We call on you to make a decision that visibly rejects discrimination, retaliation, and intimidation. We call on you to bring in fresh air and create an atmosphere where any conscientious employee can raise concerns about waste, fraud, abuse and discrimination. We need your decisive leadership to end the paralysis of silence. 

We ask you to find the moral courage and clarity to remove Mr. Rafael DeLeon from the EPA. If you need more than five (5) business days to respond to our concerns, please let me know when I might expect your response.

Sincerely,


Richard R. Renner
Legal Director
National Whistleblowers Center

Judge compels deposition of EPA official

Bookmark and Share

Dr. David L. LewisU.S. District Judge Clay Land, of Athens, Georgia, issued an order yesterday compelling the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to provide their employee Madolyn Dominy for deposition in a whistleblower's scientific fraud case.   Madolyn Dominy was the EPA's Regional Biosolids Coordinator from 1998 to 2004.  In his whistleblower lawsuit, Dr. David L. Lewis (pictured) and dairy farmers Andy McElmurray and William Boyce claim that researchers at the University of Georgia (UGA) conspired with EPA employees to make false statements as part of a grant application to justify land application of sewage sludge. The law firm of Hallman & Wingate of Marietta, Georgia, represents Dr. Lewis, McElmurray and Boyce in this case. The EPA tried to use is "Touhy" regulation to prevent Hallman & Wingate from deposing Dominy.  Yesterday, Judge Land rejected this attempt, and ordered that EPA make Dominy available for deposition by September 11, 2009. A copy of the order is available at this link.

 

Dr. Lewis and the dairy farmers filed their lawsuit under the federal False Claims Act.  They initially asked the government to intervene to recover money the researchers obtained under false pretenses.  The government declined, so they are pursuing discovery to prove that the researchers' "Gaskin Study" containing false, unreliable and fabricated scientific data regarding the effects of sewage sludge on animal health and land. Dr. Lewis and the farmers also claim that the researchers cited the Gaskin Study in additional grant applications, thus violating the False Claims Act again. The lawsuit arises from the EPA's efforts to justify its "Sludge Rule" that allows sewage sludge to be spread on certain open lands. The Sludge Rule is at 40 C.F.R. Part 503. Dr. Lewis has determined that the EPA's rule lacks the scientific basis needed to assure its safety.

The Gaskin Study related to sewage sludge that was processed by an Augusta, Georgia wastewater treatment plant and applied as fertilizer to various parcels of land, including the farms of Boyce and McElmurray. During the late 1990s, Boyce and McElmurray claim that the sewage sludge contained hazardous wastes which ultimately poisoned and killed their dairy cows. Together with Dr. Lewis, they claim that the UGA researchers and EPA employees worked together on studies of the Augusta sewage sludge land application project with an agenda of promoting land application of sewage sludge as safe and beneficial and discrediting any allegations to the contrary. As the EPA’s Region 4 Biosolids Coordinator from 1998 to 2004, Dominy participated in the project from its initial stages on. Her deposition would be a meeting of Dominy and all the lawyers in the case in which the lawyers could ask her questions and record her answers for use as evidence.

The EPA had cited its Touhy regulation in its effort to block this deposition. In a case called United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462, 469-70 (1951), the Supreme Court held that federal agency could establish conditions for their employees in responding to subpoenas.  In this case, EPA has a Touhy regulation at 40 C.F.R. § 2.402(b). It says that its employees can respond only if EPA management gives permission.  In this case, EPA denied permission.  The Court found that the EPA’s refusal to allow her to be deposed based solely on an unsubstantiated and subjective belief that she possesses no relevant information was "arbitrary and capricious."