In yesterday’s Washington Post, an editorial called "Charging WikiLeaks" urges the Obama administration to refrain from pressing criminal charges against WikiLeaks leaders for releasing classified State Department cables. "Media outlets do not have a legal duty to abide by the government’s secrecy demands," the editorial declares. What should the government do? At the end of

Stephen M. Kohn Ed O’Keefe of The Washington Post is quoting Stephen M. Kohn, Executive Director of the National Whistleblowers Center, in a story appearing on today’s Fed Page. Called, “Immigration agency assailed over leak probe,” the story reports on criticism the immigration service is getting from the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) Local

Today’s Washington Post (Metro page B-1) reports on "a blunt assessment" of Washington DC’s Metro transit administration.  Retired Metro manager David L. Gunn wrote the report.  Among other problems, it finds a "shoot the messenger" phenomenon "that discourages employees from raising safety concerns." The report is particularly sobering in light of last year’s collision that

On October 14, the Washington Post ran a story on Metro drivers going “Strictly by the Book” (p. B-1). The story highlights safety issues that reach beyond Metro. That the Post’s writer would be concerned about the disruption reveals a prevalent but dangerous attitude that speed is more important than safety.

As an advocate for whistleblowers, I am particularly concerned that the bus drivers speaking to the reporter were afraid of retaliation. The National Transit Systems Security Act of 2007 (NTSSA) has given every transit system employee the right to put safety first, to bypass the chain of command, and to disobey unsafe or illegal orders. Under NTSSA, every Metro employee has legal protection if they choose to speak to a newspaper about safety concerns. They would be protected if they follow safety rules and run “late” as a result.
Continue Reading

Robert MacLeanBookmark and Share

Robert MacLean is a former federal air marshal. During the Summer of 2003, he exposed a plan by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to stop all overnight travel by the air marshals to save money on the budget.  This shutdown of air marshal travel came at the same time that the Department of Homeland Security was reporting an active al-Qaeda suicide hijack plan.  MacLean’s courageous disclosure prompted Congressional and public outrage.  In response, TSA reversed its decision, continued air marshal travel, and fired MacLean for making the disclosure.  MacLean also raised concerns about how TSA’s dress code for air marshals made them easy for terrorists to identify.

Yesterday, a House committee heard testimony from the Director of the Federal Air Marshal Service (FAMS), Robert Bray.  Bray told Congressman Bill Pascrell (New Jersey) that it was a problem that his predecessors ignored whistleblower complaints of safety and security problems.  The old management forced the whistleblowers to go to the media. Rep. Pascrell insisted that the TSA should give MacLean and others their jobs back: “pure and simple.”

Joe Davidson reports in today’s Washington Post that Pascrell showed concern about MacLean’s case. MacLean is “still twisting in the wind,” Pascrell told Davidson. “I think it’s very unfair.”

MacLean has posted seven (7) minutes of excerpts of the hearing on YouTube.


Continue Reading

As you know, we have been waging an intense campaign for new whistleblower protection laws. We have experienced recent victories and setbacks. And now, prominent whistleblowers like Bunny Greenhouse are calling us all to action. Throughout this campaign, our staff has been incredibly impressed with the level of support shown by our blog readers